2006 IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting 2006
DOI: 10.1109/pes.2006.1709011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel adaptive scheme of discrimination between internal faults and inrush currents of transformer using mathematical morphology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Determining their exact effect in the frequency domain is not trivial, as they are nonlinear operators, but one can easily observe a low-pass effect from Figure 3. In recent years, the mathematical morphology was applied to many areas such as power quality monitoring, 21 fault diagnosis on power transformers, 22 and broken rotor bar detection in induction motors. 23…”
Section: Feature Extraction Using Mathematical Morphology Mathematicamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Determining their exact effect in the frequency domain is not trivial, as they are nonlinear operators, but one can easily observe a low-pass effect from Figure 3. In recent years, the mathematical morphology was applied to many areas such as power quality monitoring, 21 fault diagnosis on power transformers, 22 and broken rotor bar detection in induction motors. 23…”
Section: Feature Extraction Using Mathematical Morphology Mathematicamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore there should be proper differentiation between inrush currents and fault currents. Based on the transient characteristics of the short circuit and inrush currents, the difference between them can be easily determined by using a technique known as morphological gradient technique [1]. As the inrush current and the short circuit currents are the random signals, the samples of these signals can be taken out and processed by using correlation and digital signal processor and then it is then compared with the standard signals [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%