2021
DOI: 10.20964/2021.05.55
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Novel Adaptive Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm Based High Precision Parameter Identification and State Estimation of Lithium-Ion Battery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The parameter identification method proposed in this study is competitive with methods in other studies. For example, He et al (32) used PSO incorporating an adaptive optimization strategy for parameter identification of LIBs, and MAPE of the identification results was 1.5%. The recursive LS method used by Yang et al (33) was applied to the experimental data in this study, and the RMSE value was 0.0473.…”
Section: Experimental Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The parameter identification method proposed in this study is competitive with methods in other studies. For example, He et al (32) used PSO incorporating an adaptive optimization strategy for parameter identification of LIBs, and MAPE of the identification results was 1.5%. The recursive LS method used by Yang et al (33) was applied to the experimental data in this study, and the RMSE value was 0.0473.…”
Section: Experimental Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adaptive PSO [269], exponential decay PSO (EDPSO) [270], PSO with chaos theory [271], hybrid PSO and gravitational search algorithm (PSO-CGSA) [243] Power System controllers Hybrid PSO-pattern search [244], PSO with Pade approximation [245] Capacitor Placement Constriction factor PSO [272], hybrid PSO [247] Generation expansion problem Comprehensive learning PSO [273], fuzzy adaptive chaotic binary PSO [274] Power system reliability and security…”
Section: State Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5] Literature review.-Currently, several techniques regarding SOC estimation of LIBs have been studied and applied. Mainly composed of four categories: traditional methods including open-circuit voltage method (OCV), 6,7 coulomb counting (CC), 8 and Kalman filter (KF) algorithm, 9 novel algorithms including various adaptive observers, [10][11][12][13] deformation of algorithms Kalman filter and particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm, 14,15 Gaussian process regression method (GPR); 16 machine learning algorithms including neural network algorithms and support vector machine method and hybrid methods including coulomb counting and Kalman filter combination, 17 and neural network algorithms with Kalman filter compound. 18,19 Concerning various algorithms, this paper mainly introduces traditional methods, the popular deformation algorithms of the Kalman algorithm, and the neural network algorithms.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%