IEEE 36th Conference on Power Electronics Specialists, 2005.
DOI: 10.1109/pesc.2005.1581893
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Novel Active Frequency Drift Method of Islanding Prevention for the grid-connected Photovoltaic Inverter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
40
0
3

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
4
40
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…SFS method is an innovative method enhanced from Active Frequency Drift (AFD) [29]. SFS using positive feedback by creating to some extent uneven phase angle at inverter output current through adding up truncations or dead times to the current waveform [23,25].…”
Section: Sandia Frequency Shift (Sfs)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SFS method is an innovative method enhanced from Active Frequency Drift (AFD) [29]. SFS using positive feedback by creating to some extent uneven phase angle at inverter output current through adding up truncations or dead times to the current waveform [23,25].…”
Section: Sandia Frequency Shift (Sfs)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But, due to the fixed value of cf, the conventional AFD has a large NDZ and is too slow to meet the islanding detection time limit. 11 So, positive feedback is used in the control of the inverter so that APF (Active Power Filter) absorbs (supplies) more reactive power as the island's frequency increases (or decreases),…”
Section: A the Cdpf Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 In order to weaken previous adverse effect, the positive feedback is accessed in IDMs. Several feedback IDMs are mentioned in this article including Current-Disturbing Positive Feedback (CDPF), 9,10 Active Frequency Drift Positive Feedback (AFDPF), 11,12 and Sandia Frequency Shift (SFS) 13,14 IDMs. They are commonly used in current islanding detection.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the AFD method produces a small degradation in the quality of the DG output and the inverter has an NDZ that depends on the value of the chopping factor. There are similar techniques allowing to obtain better results by changing the chopping factor, with a significant reduction in the NDZ, like the following ones: Active Frequency Drift with Positive Feedback (AFDPF) (Jung et al, 2005), AFD with Pulsation of Chopping Fraction (AFDPCF) (Liu et al, 2007), among others.…”
Section: Active Frequency Drift (Afd)mentioning
confidence: 99%