A novel 3D-printed solid phase microextraction device equipped with silver-polyaniline coated pencil lead for the extraction of phthalate esters in cosmeceutical products

Chunin, Nichapat; Phooplub, Kittirat; Kaewpet, Morakot; Wattanasin, Panwadee; Kanatharana, Proespichaya; Thavarungkul, Panote; Thammakhet‐Buranachai, Chongdee

doi:10.1016/j.aca.2019.09.036

Cited by 30 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 37 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…26 This result indicates poor adsorption ability for polar substances but strong adsorption affinity for weakly polar or nonpolar substances. The polar index values are 4.4 for EA 33 and 2.5 for xylene. 34 The polarity index of xylene is lower than that of EA, thereby indicating that the former exhibits a stronger adsorption interaction with BCFPs than the latter.…”

Section: Effects Of Key Parameters On Adsorption Performance Of Sole mentioning

confidence: 97%

Coadsorption of gaseous xylene, ethyl acetate and water onto porous biomass carbon foam pellets derived from liquefied Vallisneria natans waste

Sun

Yuan

Liu

et al. 2020

J of Chemical Tech & Biotech

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BACKGROUND Only a few studies have focused on the purification of waste gas containing a mixture of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) with engineered biochar. The adsorption behaviors of gaseous xylene and ethyl acetate (EA) individually and in binary mixture onto porous biomass carbon foam pellets (BCFPs) were studied by static headspace gas chromatography. RESULTS The removal efficiency nearly reached 100% for 17.32 mg L−1 xylene and 18.02 mg L−1 EA within 120 min at a BCFP dosage of 0.2 g L−1, a temperature of 40 °C and a relative humidity of 30%. The adsorption behavior followed the pseudo‐second‐order kinetic model for single and binary mixtures of xylene and EA. The coexistence of xylene had considerable influence on the adsorption performance of EA, whereas the coexistence of EA exhibited minimal effect on the adsorption performance of xylene. The monolayer adsorption capacities of sole xylene and EA were 250.63 and 206.61 mg g−1 respectively. The total adsorption capacity reached 322.36 mg g−1 for the binary mixture, but the adsorption capacity for sole xylene and EA decreased because of competitive adsorption. The adsorption process was spontaneous and endothermic. Pore filling was involved in the adsorption of xylene and EA onto BCFPs. Meanwhile, xylene adsorption was involved in the hydrophobic interaction and π–π electron dispersion interaction. CONCLUSION BCFPs are an effective adsorbent for VOC adsorptive removal from waste gas. Competitive adsorption between xylene and EA on BCFPs was determined. Results indicated that the physicochemical properties of VOCs had an effect on the adsorption performance. © 2019 Society of Chemical Industry

show abstract

Section: Effects Of Key Parameters On Adsorption Performance Of Sole mentioning

confidence: 97%

Coadsorption of gaseous xylene, ethyl acetate and water onto porous biomass carbon foam pellets derived from liquefied Vallisneria natans waste

Sun

Yuan

Liu

et al. 2020

J of Chemical Tech & Biotech

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This disadvantage led to wide research for replacement new solid supports for coating. Pencil lead is another try for replacing fused silica [60]. This graphite based support is cheap with high mechanical rigidity and high conductivity that is a good choice for electrochemical coating approaches.…”

Section: Types Of Supports In Spme Techniquesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Applications of porous frameworks in solid‐phase microextraction

Khataei

Yamini

Shamsayei

2021

J of Separation Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Porous frameworks are a term of attracting solid materials assembled by interconnection of molecules and ions. These trendy materials due to high chemical and thermal stability, well-defined pore size and structure, and high effective surface area gained attention to employ as extraction phase in sample pretreatment methods before analytical analysis. Solid-phase microextraction is an important subclass of sample preparation technique that up to now different configurations of this method have been introduced to get adaptable with different environments and analytical instruments. In this review, theoretical aspect and different modes of solid-phase microextraction method are investigated. Different classes of porous frameworks and their applications as extraction phase in the proposed microextraction method are evaluated. Types and features of supporting substrates and coating procedures of porous frameworks on them are reviewed. At the end, the prospective and the challenges ahead in this field are discussed.

show abstract

“…Indeed, Smith et al were able to successfully monitor ketamine using a necklace that had been outfitted with an SPME device . Furthermore, it may be possible to create wearable in vivo sampling devices by coating the surface of the devices with biocompatible materials or even using 3D printing to customize the design of such SPME devices . Such innovations would enable the use of in vivo SPME to collect the environmental information for a person, which would in turn allow the construction of a personalized exposure history …”

Section: Application Of In Vivo Spmementioning

confidence: 99%

In Vivo Solid-Phase Microextraction and Applications in Environmental Sciences

Roszkowska

Pawliszyn

2021

ACS Environ. Au

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Solid-phase microextraction (SPME) is a wellestablished sample-preparation technique for environmental studies. The application of SPME has extended from the headspace extraction of volatile compounds to the capture of active components in living organisms via the direct immersion of SPME probes into the tissue (in vivo SPME). The development of biocompatible coatings and the availability of different calibration approaches enable the in vivo sampling of exogenous and endogenous compounds from the living plants and animals without the need for tissue collection. In addition, new geometries such as thin-film coatings, needle-trap devices, recession needles, coated tips, and blades have increased the sensitivity and robustness of in vivo sampling. In this paper, we detail the fundamentals of in vivo SPME, including the various extraction modes, coating geometries, calibration methods, and data analysis methods that are commonly employed. We also discuss recent applications of in vivo SPME in environmental studies and in the analysis of pollutants in plant and animal tissues, as well as in human saliva, breath, and skin analysis. As we show, in vivo SPME has tremendous potential for the targeted and untargeted screening of small molecules in living organisms for environmental monitoring applications.

show abstract

A novel 3D-printed solid phase microextraction device equipped with silver-polyaniline coated pencil lead for the extraction of phthalate esters in cosmeceutical products

Cited by 30 publications

References 37 publications

Coadsorption of gaseous xylene, ethyl acetate and water onto porous biomass carbon foam pellets derived from liquefied Vallisneria natans waste

Coadsorption of gaseous xylene, ethyl acetate and water onto porous biomass carbon foam pellets derived from liquefied Vallisneria natans waste

Applications of porous frameworks in solid‐phase microextraction

In Vivo Solid-Phase Microextraction and Applications in Environmental Sciences

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About