2013
DOI: 10.1007/s00193-013-0452-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A note on weak shock wave reflection

Abstract: This work discusses the possibility of reconstructing, both numerically and experimentally, the steady state flow field and shock reflection pattern close to the triple point of von Neumann, Guderley and Vasilev reflections. First, a criterion for the orientation of shockwave fronts, even in the case of subcritical/subsonic flow downstream the front, is introduced and formalized. Then, a technique for obtaining a close view of the above reflection patterns centered about the triple point is described and a num… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The model does not account for transient momentum dissipation due to shock wave reflections that occur when obstacles force a supercritical flow to change its direction (Guinot, 2012(Guinot, , 2017bGuinot et al, 2017Guinot et al, , 2018Viero et al, 2013b). This is consistent with the fact that the Finite Element model is not intended to deal with supercritical flows nor with shock waves.…”
Section: Additional Remarks On the Dual Porosity Subgrid Modelmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The model does not account for transient momentum dissipation due to shock wave reflections that occur when obstacles force a supercritical flow to change its direction (Guinot, 2012(Guinot, , 2017bGuinot et al, 2017Guinot et al, , 2018Viero et al, 2013b). This is consistent with the fact that the Finite Element model is not intended to deal with supercritical flows nor with shock waves.…”
Section: Additional Remarks On the Dual Porosity Subgrid Modelmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The numerical model solves the depth-averaged shallow water equations, written in conservative vector form, using a Godunov-type method on unstructured triangular grids [24][25][26]. To properly deal with sloping channel, the model uses a second-order accurate description of the channel bed, i.e., bottom elevations are defined at the grid nodes and are assumed to vary linearly within each element of the mesh [27,28].…”
Section: The Numerical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It's worth noting that the assumption of mutually orthogonal principal direction can be removed by considering different angles for each principal axes [12]; nonetheless, the effectiveness of the tensorial representation of conveyance porosity, the existence of (and the possibility of detecting) principal directions, and the computation of hydraulically significant conveyance porosities in real urban layouts are questionable tasks that deserve further investigation. At the moment, the model does not account for building drag (this can be included according to [12]), nor for transient momentum dissipation due to shock wave reflection [12,34], since the model is not intended to deal with supercritical flows nor with shock waves.…”
Section: Porosity Treatment Of Urbanized Areasmentioning
confidence: 99%