2014
DOI: 10.1134/s0001434614070281
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A note on the upper bound for disjoint convex partitions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We showed n(3, 3, 5) = 12 in [17]. We have proved that n(3, 3, 5) = 12 [17], n(4, 4, 5) ≤ 16 [18] and also discuss a disjoint holes problem in preference [19]. In this paper, we will continue discussing this problem and prove that n(3, 4, 5) = 13.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…We showed n(3, 3, 5) = 12 in [17]. We have proved that n(3, 3, 5) = 12 [17], n(4, 4, 5) ≤ 16 [18] and also discuss a disjoint holes problem in preference [19]. In this paper, we will continue discussing this problem and prove that n(3, 4, 5) = 13.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%