1998
DOI: 10.1029/98wr02741
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A note on the time compression approximation

Abstract: Abstract. In this paper the work by Sivapalan and Milly [1989] is extended beyond the time of pending to estimate the errors of the time compression approximation (TCA) when an exact solution exists. The diffusion coefficient is set to be constant, and gravitational effects are not considered here. The largest error of standard TCA in calculating cumulative infiltration is about 2.5%, while its underestimate of the time to pending is about 19%. A modified TCA is also proposed, in which the exact time of pendi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The The problem is first solved numerically to obtain I(t) by linearizing the right-hand side of (3) using the transform u = • D dO and then applying the method of lines [Schiesser, 1991] with a finite volume discretization on a fine variable spatial grid and a stiff ordinary differential equation integrator. In particular, for a -0, numerical and exact analytical results [Liu et al, 1998] are identical for the number of significant figures given in Table la. Tables lb, lc …”
Section: Time Compression Analysismentioning
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The The problem is first solved numerically to obtain I(t) by linearizing the right-hand side of (3) using the transform u = • D dO and then applying the method of lines [Schiesser, 1991] with a finite volume discretization on a fine variable spatial grid and a stiff ordinary differential equation integrator. In particular, for a -0, numerical and exact analytical results [Liu et al, 1998] are identical for the number of significant figures given in Table la. Tables lb, lc …”
Section: Time Compression Analysismentioning
confidence: 57%
“…An earlier paper [Liu et al, 1998] showed that the time compression approximation (TCA) predicts the cumulative infiltration with remarkable accuracy for linear soils. As pointed out by Salvucci and Entekkabi [1994], knowledge of the cumulative infiltration is most important in practice, whereas others, like infiltration rates after ponding, are less important.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[39] Modification of the TCA that does not assume that the average flux before ponding is the flux at ponding but rather uses a priori information on t p or I(t p ) was proposed by Liu et al [1998], Parlange et al [2000], and Hogarth et al [2011]. This modification reduced by half the error in the cumulative infiltration estimates resulting from the original TCA.…”
Section: Postponding Infiltration: Tcamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Liu et al (1998) provide a nice description of the exact solution for one dimensional linearized infiltration. As an approximate correction for the difference between the exact infiltration solution and the Philip solution, according to the time-compression approximation (TCA) (also termed the Infiltrability-Depth Approximation, see Smith, 2002, for detailed discussion), cumulative infiltration may be used as a surrogate for time (Sherman, 1943;Liu et al, 1998). Accordingly, one assumes that at time t p the cumulative infiltration under the constant flux is equal to the cumulative infiltration under the Philip curve up to time t e .…”
Section: Infiltrationmentioning
confidence: 99%