1992
DOI: 10.1007/bf00006505
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A note on the synonymy of some Neodiaptomus spp. (Copepoda, Calanoida) of the Indian subcontinent

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Neodiaptomus is represented by four valid species namely N. schmackeri (Poppe and Richard, 1892), N. physalipus (Kiefer, 1935), N. lindbergi (Brehm 1951), N. intermedius (Flobner, 1984) in Indian subcontinent. Neodiaptomus meggiti is recorded in Mayanmar and Malaysia, Fernando 1978 and while never been reported in Indian subcontinent except of single report from Andaman (Reddy, 2000), whereas N. schmackeri is reported in Thailand (Sanoamuang & Athibai, 2002), mainland India (Reddy and Reddy, 1992) and adjoining countries to Andaman but not reported from Andaman.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Neodiaptomus is represented by four valid species namely N. schmackeri (Poppe and Richard, 1892), N. physalipus (Kiefer, 1935), N. lindbergi (Brehm 1951), N. intermedius (Flobner, 1984) in Indian subcontinent. Neodiaptomus meggiti is recorded in Mayanmar and Malaysia, Fernando 1978 and while never been reported in Indian subcontinent except of single report from Andaman (Reddy, 2000), whereas N. schmackeri is reported in Thailand (Sanoamuang & Athibai, 2002), mainland India (Reddy and Reddy, 1992) and adjoining countries to Andaman but not reported from Andaman.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The observed inter population distances (maximum divergence of 7.7 %) between N. schmackeri and N. meggiti suggest that both the species are separate and share a different evolutionary lineage. The N. schmackeri is distributed throughout the Indo pacific region (Reddy and Reddy 1992;Sanoamuang & Athibai, 2002) whereas the distribution of N. meggitti is limited up to Andaman and Nicobar Islands and this species is not reported from mainland India. The occurrence of N. meggitti at Andaman Island might be due to its closeness of to Thailand and Malaysian land than the large oceanic barrier in between Andaman Island and mainland India.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…It is a Palaearctic species, reported also in the United States (including Alaska) by Dussart and Defaye (2002), and one of the most widely N o n -c o m m e r c i a l u s e o n l y Russia (Dussart and Defaye, 2002 and reference therein), Japan (Semura et al, 1986), and Taiwan (Young and Shih, 2011). N. schmackeri is the type species of the genus Neodiaptomus (Ranga Reddy and Subba Reddy, 1992;Ranga Reddy 1994;Dussart and Defaye, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%