2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfbs.2018.08.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A note on the relationships between learning, market, and entrepreneurial orientations in family and nonfamily firms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
55
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 136 publications
4
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, scholars have employed measures that best align with their theories and research designs (Covin & Wales, 2012). Consistent with recent studies (e.g., Hernández-Linares, Kellermanns, & López-Fernández, 2018;Lumpkin et al, 2010), we adopt the Lumpkin and Dess (1996) perspective, for three reasons. First, Miller's (1983) Gestalt approach neglects the individual influence of each dimension, whereas Lumpkin and Dess (1996) recognize that each dimension may vary independently and may be beneficial or desirable depending on the context.…”
Section: Conceptual Framework and Hypotheses Developmentmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hence, scholars have employed measures that best align with their theories and research designs (Covin & Wales, 2012). Consistent with recent studies (e.g., Hernández-Linares, Kellermanns, & López-Fernández, 2018;Lumpkin et al, 2010), we adopt the Lumpkin and Dess (1996) perspective, for three reasons. First, Miller's (1983) Gestalt approach neglects the individual influence of each dimension, whereas Lumpkin and Dess (1996) recognize that each dimension may vary independently and may be beneficial or desirable depending on the context.…”
Section: Conceptual Framework and Hypotheses Developmentmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The data used for this study were collected as part of a wider research project using a survey instrument applied in the first half of 2015. Small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) are defined as non-listed private companies with 10–249 employees (e.g., Hernández-Linares, Kellermanns, & López-Fernández, 2018). We focus on the Iberian Peninsula because of the fundamental similarities between Portugal and Spain, which are both latecomers to the democratic process (Linz, 1979), with shared boundaries and an economic and cultural proximity.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On firm level (Table 3), we chose as independent variables the ownership (percentage of shares owned by a group of people united by the same surname), the family directors presence (percentage of administrators also part of the family) and, lastly, the family power, developed as the product of family directors and ownership (Carney et al, 2017; Drago et al, 2018; Duréndez & Madrid‐Guijarro, 2018; Poutziouris et al, 2015). Finally, as control variables, we used the firm's age, the leverage (debt/equity ratio), the firms size (natural logarithm of total assets), and the family radication, represented by the product between ownership, and the generational stage of the family firm (Debicki, Kellermanns, Chrisman, Pearson & Spencer, 2016; De Massis et al, 2013; Gallo & Vilaseca, 1996; Hernández‐Linares et al, 2018; Sciascia et al, 2014).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fourth, we controlled for cash flow from operations (CFO), establishing the relationship between this variable and total assets, because firms with higher levels of cash flow and greater variability in accounting results are more likely to carry out earnings management (Paiva et al, 2019). The fifth control variable is the age of firm (Age), measured as the number of years from its inception to the year of observation (Hernández-Linares et al, 2018a;Michelon & Parbonetti, 2012). We controlled for this variable because literature has suggested that earning management might depend on firm age (e.g., Stockmans et al, 2013).…”
Section: Control Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%