1969
DOI: 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1969.tb00794.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Note on the Posterior Mean of a Population Mean

Abstract: Summary It is a well‐known result, see for example Lindley (1965) and Raiffa and Schlaifer (1961), that if x̄ is the mean of a sample of independent observations distributed N(μ, σ2) where σ2 is known, and if μ has been assigned a normal prior distribution, N(m, v), then the posterior expectation of μ, given the sufficient statistic x̄, has the form {x̄(n/σ2) + m/v}/{(n/σ2)+1/v}, that is, has the intuitively appealing form of a weighted average of the prior mean and sample mean with weights inversely proportio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Define the signal accuracy as t = 1/E Var Y . It can be shown (Ericson 1969) that E Y is a weighted average of the prior mean E and the signal Y :…”
Section: The Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Define the signal accuracy as t = 1/E Var Y . It can be shown (Ericson 1969) that E Y is a weighted average of the prior mean E and the signal Y :…”
Section: The Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of the new variable, h ( y ) becomes (2) and (3). the following tinear-quadratic optimal control problem in %': Furthermore, remembering that the EVSI is non-negative, the above problem is equivalent to max xz( 1) Note, however, that there is a twist to the problem in that the dynamics (5) evolve on the restricted "time" interval [sO,l], whereas we are interested in the optimal control function g*:[O,l] + %l; however, the action on the "preliminary" interval [O,sO] affects the (integral) control conditions (2) and (3).…”
Section: Appendix: Proof Of Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The accuracy t i is proportional to the sample size when Y i is a sample mean from independent sampling. It can be shown (Ericson 1969) that…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%