2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.apnum.2019.10.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A note on the optimal degree of the weak gradient of the stabilizer free weak Galerkin finite element method

Abstract: Recently, a new stabilizer free weak Galerkin method (SFWG) is proposed, which is easier to implement and more efficient. The main idea is that by letting j ≥ j 0 for some j 0 , where j is the degree of the polynomials used to compute the weak gradients, then the stabilizer term in the regular weak Galerkin method is no longer needed. Later on in [1], the optimal of such j 0 for certain type of finite element spaces was given. In this paper, we propose a new efficient SFWG scheme using the lowest possible orde… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is easy to see that ‖ v ‖ 1, h defines a norm in V h . But ||| · ||| also defines a norm in V h , by the following norm equivalence which has been proved in References 10 and 27, to each component of v . C1v1,h|||v|||C2v1,hvVh. …”
Section: Well Posednessmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is easy to see that ‖ v ‖ 1, h defines a norm in V h . But ||| · ||| also defines a norm in V h , by the following norm equivalence which has been proved in References 10 and 27, to each component of v . C1v1,h|||v|||C2v1,hvVh. …”
Section: Well Posednessmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Remark The choice of j in (14) depends on the number of sides/faces of polygon/polyhedron. For triangular mesh, we can choose j = k + 1 27 . In general, j = n + k − 1, where n is the number of edges of polygon 10 …”
Section: Finite Element Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Removing stabilizers from WG finite element methods will simplify formulations and reduce programming complexity significantly. Stabilizer free WG finite element methods have been studied in [15][16][17]. The idea is to increase the connectivity of a weak function cross element boundary by raising the degree of polynomials for computing weak derivatives.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Removing stabilizers from discontinuous finite element methods simplifies finite element formulations and reduces programming complexity. Stabilizer free WG finite element methods have been studied in [1,19,22]. The idea is increasing the connectivity of a weak function across element boundary by raising the degree of polynomials for computing weak derivatives.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [19], we have proved that a stabilizer can be removed from the WG finite element formulation for the WG element (P k (T ), P k (e), [P j (T )] d ) if j ≥ k + n − 1, where n is the number of edges/faces of an element. The condition j ≥ k + n − 1 has been relaxed in [1]. Stabilizer free DG methods have also been developed in [20,21].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%