2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jalgebra.2005.10.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A note on the Matlis category equivalence

Abstract: We provide additional information concerning the important Matlis category equivalence between the categories of h-divisible torsion and R-complete torsion-free R-modules over any domain R. We identify the h-divisible modules that correspond under this category equivalence to the Enochs cotorsion torsion-free modules as the weak-injective modules. As a consequence, we can characterize weak-injective modules in terms of their flat covers. We also determine the range of the injective dimensions of pure-injective… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
(4 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Suppose that in the above diagram we start with the bottom exact sequence with (W , γ ) as the weak-injective envelope of M; the existence of such an exact sequence is guaranteed by [9] or [7]. Next we take the flat cover (E, β) of W ; in view of [10], flat covers of weak-injectives are torsion-free injectives, so E is torsion-free injective. Let H = Ker β, and define α : F → M as the restriction of β.…”
Section: Proposition 44 the Weak-injective Envelope Of A Module Is mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Suppose that in the above diagram we start with the bottom exact sequence with (W , γ ) as the weak-injective envelope of M; the existence of such an exact sequence is guaranteed by [9] or [7]. Next we take the flat cover (E, β) of W ; in view of [10], flat covers of weak-injectives are torsion-free injectives, so E is torsion-free injective. Let H = Ker β, and define α : F → M as the restriction of β.…”
Section: Proposition 44 the Weak-injective Envelope Of A Module Is mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lee [10] proved that the statement that all weak-injective R-modules are pure-injective is equivalent to saying that all torsion-free Enochs-cotorsion modules are pure-injective by showing that over a domain R, in the Matlis category equivalence, the weak-injective (resp. the h-divisible pure-injective) torsion modules D correspond to the Enochs-cotorsion (resp.…”
Section: Weak-injective Modules and Pure-injectivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence E 2 = 0 = W 2 , and W is the weak-injective envelope of A. Conversely, suppose that in the above diagram we start with the bottom exact sequence with (W , γ ) as the weak-injective envelope of A; the existence of such an exact sequence is guaranteed by Lee [9] or Göbel and Trlifaj [7]. Next we take the flat cover (E, β) of W ; in view of Lee [10], flat covers of weak-injectives are torsion-free injectives, so E is torsion-free injective. Let H = Ker β, and define α : F → A as the restriction of β.…”
Section: Weak-injective Envelopesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In general, the class of weak-injectives lies strictly between the classes of h-divisible and injective R-modules. For their main properties we refer to papers [8,9].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%