2018
DOI: 10.2140/agt.2018.18.3669
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A note on the knot Floer homology of fibered knots

Abstract: We prove that the knot Floer homology of a fibered knot is nontrivial in its nextto-top Alexander grading. Immediate applications include new proofs of Krcatovich's result that knots with L-space surgeries are prime and Hedden and Watson's result that the rank of knot Floer homology detects the trefoil among knots in the 3-sphere. We also generalize the latter result, proving a similar theorem for nullhomologous knots in any 3-manifold. We note that our method of proof inspired Baldwin and Sivek's recent proof… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
31
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(22 reference statements)
1
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6 for its definition) is nontrivial. It is known that the contact manifolds with nonvanishing invariant form a proper subset of tight contact manifolds, and the extent to which the two classes differ is an interesting subject (7)(8)(9)(10)(11). One should compare our result to a Bennequin bound for surfaces in compact 4-manifolds with ∂W = Y and nontrivial Seiberg-Witten invariant relative to ξ, proved by Mrowka and…”
mentioning
confidence: 76%
“…6 for its definition) is nontrivial. It is known that the contact manifolds with nonvanishing invariant form a proper subset of tight contact manifolds, and the extent to which the two classes differ is an interesting subject (7)(8)(9)(10)(11). One should compare our result to a Bennequin bound for surfaces in compact 4-manifolds with ∂W = Y and nontrivial Seiberg-Witten invariant relative to ξ, proved by Mrowka and…”
mentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Then K is fibered, and we may assume that g2 or else dimHFK̂false(Kfalse)=3, which would contradict our conclusion that dimHFK̂false(Kfalse)=5. Furthermore, we have that dimHFK̂false(K,g1false)0 by [3], as above. In fact, since dimHFK̂false(Kfalse)=5, we must have that dimHFK̂false(K,g1false)=1.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 87%
“…It then follows from work of Baldwin and Vela‐Vick [3] that HFK̂false(K,g1false)0 as well. (This result is stated in [3] with coefficients in Z/2Z but also holds over double-struckQ.) But this implies that dimHFK̂false(Kfalse)>5, a contradiction.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This inequality has been known for knots with thin knot Floer homology [10], L-space knots [4], fibered knots in any closed oriented 3-manifolds [1]. In this paper, we will prove (1) when HF K(Z, K, [F ], g) is supported in a single Z/2Zgrading.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%