2013
DOI: 10.1177/0272989x12475093
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Note on the Expected Biases in Conventional Iterative Health State Valuation Protocols

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We also did not study the EuroQol-5D or other indirect measures. The TTO and standard gamble in the present study are susceptible to a number of cognitive biases, including misspecification bias and anchoring bias, as they are in other studies [47].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…We also did not study the EuroQol-5D or other indirect measures. The TTO and standard gamble in the present study are susceptible to a number of cognitive biases, including misspecification bias and anchoring bias, as they are in other studies [47].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…This observation points toward some kind of preference construction, where respondents are influenced by the initial question. That is, they may be subject to an anchoring bias, as reported earlier in TTO and WTP studies (Samuelsen et al, 2012;Ternent and Tsuchiya, 2013;van Exel et al, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…We are not aware of any other study in the health literature explicitly designed to test for the existence of sequence effects. Although “the typical way of neutralizing question order bias in the aggregate is to randomise the order in which different health states are valued” (Ternent & Tsuchiya, , p545) if our explanation of sequence effects is correct, randomisation will not avoid those effects. Our results (Section ) support this, as we present strong evidence of sequence effects, which are not avoided through randomisation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%