1971
DOI: 10.1017/s0003356100029573
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A note on the effect of docking on fat deposition in fat-tailed sheep

Abstract: SUMMARYThe deposition of body and subcutaneous fat was compared in two groups of fat-tailed sheep, the one group docked shortly after birth and the tails of the other left intact. The slightly heavier live and carcass weights of the latter animals could be accounted for almost entirely by their significantly heavier weights of caudal fat, there being no firm evidence in support of increased internal or subcutaneous fatty deposition following amputation of the cauda.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
1

Year Published

1980
1980
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
(1 reference statement)
1
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Slaughter weight, empty body weight and carcass weight (including the tail weight) at 50 weeks of age tended to be higher in docked than in the undocked lambs although the effect of docking was not statistically significant (P > 0-05). These results are in contrast with those of Epstein (1961), Asker et al (1964) and Joubert & Uckermann (1971) who reported that docking decreased carcass weight. The trend to higher dressing percentages in the docked than in the undocked animals are similar to the results of Qureshi (1968) and Juma et al (1974).…”
Section: Carcass Weight and Dressing Percentagecontrasting
confidence: 91%
“…Slaughter weight, empty body weight and carcass weight (including the tail weight) at 50 weeks of age tended to be higher in docked than in the undocked lambs although the effect of docking was not statistically significant (P > 0-05). These results are in contrast with those of Epstein (1961), Asker et al (1964) and Joubert & Uckermann (1971) who reported that docking decreased carcass weight. The trend to higher dressing percentages in the docked than in the undocked animals are similar to the results of Qureshi (1968) and Juma et al (1974).…”
Section: Carcass Weight and Dressing Percentagecontrasting
confidence: 91%
“…This is in close agreement with earlier work of O'Donovan et al (1973) on Kellakui fat-tailed sheep in Iran and Alkass et al (1985) on Awassi lambs in Iraq. Similarly, results of the present experiment showed that tail docking had no effect on postweaning performance of lambs given moderate to high levels of ME ( ≥ 0·743 MJ/kg M 0·75 per day), as in earlier work by Joubert and Ueckermann (1971), O'Donovan et al (1973) and Alkass et al (1985). However, previous work with Awassi lambs by Farhan et al (1969) showed that docking decreased daily gain, dressing percentage, the percentage of fat in the carcass and carcass weight as a proportion of empty body weight.…”
Section: Food Intake and Growth Of Lambssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…In an experiment, male lambs born from Namaqua Afrikaner, Pedi, and Blackhead Persian ewes by Namaqua Africaner rams underwent tail docking or retention of their tails (Joubert and Ueckerman 1971). In addition to the generally employed C and J measurements taken, respectively, on the back and ribs, deposition of subcutaneous fat was measured with calipers across the shoulder, over the rump, and on the sternum.…”
Section: Dockingmentioning
confidence: 99%