The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2018
DOI: 10.5540/03.2018.006.01.0303
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A note on the convergence of an augmented Lagrangian algorithm to second-order stationary points

Abstract: Abstract. Many algorithms that ensure second-order necessary optimality conditions were developed in the literature. To the best of our knownledge, none of them guarantee Strong Second-Order Necessary Condition (SSONC). Gould and Toint [5] showed that we do not expect SSONC in the barrier method. In this paper, we argue by an example that the same is true for the second-order augmented Lagrangian method introduced in [1]. This reinforces the Weak Second-Order Necessary Condition as the appropriate condition fo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
2

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, [53] gives an explicit example illustrating that accumulation points of trajectories generated by barrier algorithms will converge to stationary points satisfying the weak second-order necessary condition, but not the strong version. Later, Andreani and Secchin [10] made a small modification in Gould and Toint's counterexample to come to the same conclusion for augmented Lagrangian-type algorithms. Hence, the most we can expect from our method is that it generates points that approximately satisfy the weak second-order necessary optimality conditions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Indeed, [53] gives an explicit example illustrating that accumulation points of trajectories generated by barrier algorithms will converge to stationary points satisfying the weak second-order necessary condition, but not the strong version. Later, Andreani and Secchin [10] made a small modification in Gould and Toint's counterexample to come to the same conclusion for augmented Lagrangian-type algorithms. Hence, the most we can expect from our method is that it generates points that approximately satisfy the weak second-order necessary optimality conditions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Therefore, conditions (10) and ( 11) both hold. We now check for the complementarity condition ( 14).…”
Section: Per-iteration Analysis and A Bound For The Number Of Iterationsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Assim como em PNL, temos que T (x) ̸ ⊃ T BS lin (x) em geral. Por exemplo, considere as restrições −x 3 1…”
Section: Uma Linearização Adequada Do Conjunto Viávelunclassified
“…É bem conhecido no campo da PNL que a condição necessária de segunda ordem forte não pode ser esperada nos pontos limite de algoritmos práticos [3]. Em vez disso, o conceito adequado neste contexto é a condição necessária de segunda ordem fraca, que consiste em relaxar os requisitos em relação a ∇g em (5).…”
Section: Condições De Otimalidade De 2ª Ordem: Forte E Fracaunclassified