A Note on the Behavior of Stock Returns around Ex‐Dates of Stock Distributions

Abstract

A RECENT PAPER BY Ohlson and Penman [7] (henceforth OP) documents that, for stock splits larger than two-for-one (one hundred percent), the volatility of stock returns after the ex-split date is significantly higher than the presplit volatility. The increase in the standard deviation of daily returns is of the order of twenty-eight to thirty-five percent and persists for as long as a full year after the ex-date.' Even more interesting is their finding that there is no (permanent) change in the variance of returns at the announcement date. They investigate several potential explanations for this "aberration" but are unable to find a satisfactory answer. Grinblatt, Masulis, and Titman [6] (henceforth GMT) examine the behavior of expected returns around announcement dates and exdates for stock distributions exceeding ten percent. Classifying stock distributions as either stock dividends (split factors of twenty-five percent or less) or stock splits, they conclude that return behavior differs across these two types of distributions, with stock dividends exhibiting larger abnormal returns than splits. This is interpreted by them as evidence in favor of the "retained earnings hypothesis": the dissimilar accounting treatment of these two types of stock distributions affects retained earnings in different ways, and hence splits are not simply large stock dividends. This paper extends the work of OP to all types of stock distributions. In Section I, postsplit variance is shown to be different from the presplit variance for small stock splits and stock dividends. While small splits display an increase in volatility like large splits, stock dividends are associated with a decrease in the volatility of returns. This evidence also supports GMT's conclusions that stock splits and stock dividends are "different" types of events. Section II investigates the volatility of returns for reverse splits and demonstrates that postsplit volatility decreases for these events. This evidence is complementary to Woolridge and Chambers' [9] findings that reverse splits are also associated with negative abnormal returns at their announcement and ex-dates. Section III concludes the paper. I. Small Splits and Stock DividendsOP present convincing evidence (in particular, see OP Figure 1, page 257) that the variance of returns after the ex-date for large stock splits (greater than or * Graduate School of Business, Stanford Univeniity. I am grateful to Allan Kleidon, Robert Litzenberger, Myron Scholes, Eric Terry, and especially Michael Gibbons for their helpful comments. I am responsible for all remaining errors.' This is in contrast to the temporary increases (related to trading activity) documented by Beaver [1] and others for events such as earnings announcements. 163

Şi̇rketlere Özgü Haberleri̇n Hi̇sse Performansina Etki̇si̇: Bi̇st-30 Şi̇rketleri̇ Örneği̇

“…Smith (1986), ikinci halka arz haberlerinin hisse fiyatını olumsuz yönde etkilediğini ortaya koymuştur. Dravid (1987Dravid ( ), 1962Dravid ( -1981 dö-nemi için hisse bölünmesi haberlerinin hisse oynaklığını arttırdığını belirlemiştir. Woodruff ve Senchack (1988), 1980'de Amerikan piyasalarında şirketlerin kendileri hakkında açıklamış oldukları olumlu haberlerin hisse fiyatlarını hızlı bir şekilde arttırdığı sonucuna ulaşmışlardır.…”

“…Yoon ve Starks (1995), 1969-1988 yılları arasında temettü haberlerinin genellikle pozitif getiriler elde edilmesini sağladığı belirlemiştir. Bajaj ve Vijh (1995);1962-1987 arasın-da kar ve temettü duyurularının hisse senetlerinin işlem hacmi miktarını arttırdığını belirlemişlerdir. Ikenberry ve diğerleri (1996Ikenberry ve diğerleri ( ), 1975Ikenberry ve diğerleri ( -1990 yılları arasında hisse bö-lünmesi haberlerinin hisse fiyatı üzerinde olumlu bir etkisi olduğunu belirlemişler-dir.…”

Informed Trading around Stock Split Announcements: Evidence from the Option Market

“…Stock volatility increases when splits are announced (Ohlson and Penman (1985)), which is a common occurrence for any unscheduled and meaningful corporate announcement. Finally, there is an increase in stock volatility after splits are effected (Ohlson and Penman (1985), Dravid (1987), and Koski (1998)). …”

Changes in trading volume and return volatility associated with S&P 500 index additions and deletions

“…I obtain NYSE trading volume from the historical data archive library on its website. (1976-1985) 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 Year 0 (1986-2005) 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 Ohlson and Penman (1985), Dravid (1987), and Dubofsky (1991) among others, have proposed a binomial proportionality methodology to test the statistical significance of changes in volatility. This approach assumes independence across N squared daily returns.…”

“…As noted in previous research, there are a non-trivial number of observations in which the difference between pre-change and post-change squared returns is zero. Following Dravid (1987) and Peterson and Peterson (1992), these observations are split equally between the null and alternative hypotheses.…”