2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.geomphys.2013.07.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A note on static spaces and related problems

Abstract: Abstract. In this paper we study static spaces introduced in [10,12,9,13,7] and Riemannian manifolds possessing solutions to the critical point equation introduced in [1,11,3,4]. In both cases on the manifolds there is a function f satisfying the equation f Ric = ∇ 2 f + Φg. With a similar idea used in [6,5], we have made progress in solving the classifying problem raised in [9] of vacuum static spaces and in proving the conjecture made in [1] about manifolds admitting solutions to the critical point equation … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
81
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(62 reference statements)
1
81
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The question of whether these are the only ones is still open, although there are some partial results. For instance, in [35,39] it is proven that these models are the only locally conformally flat static metrics, in [45] this result has been extended to the Bach-flat case and in [24] the case of cyclic parallel Ricci tensor has been discussed. Some pinching conditions implying the same classification are provided in [5,9].…”
Section: Introduction and Statement Of The Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The question of whether these are the only ones is still open, although there are some partial results. For instance, in [35,39] it is proven that these models are the only locally conformally flat static metrics, in [45] this result has been extended to the Bach-flat case and in [24] the case of cyclic parallel Ricci tensor has been discussed. Some pinching conditions implying the same classification are provided in [5,9].…”
Section: Introduction and Statement Of The Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(In fact, this result can be improved for three dimensional manifolds. For more details, please see [21]; also see [1] for a four dimensional result).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, it is well‐known that the second fundamental form of Σ is given by hij=eiej,e1=fij|f|,where i,j={2,3,4}. Moreover, its mean curvature is HΣ=1|f|2f11Δf. Therefore, we combine the fundamental equation with to conclude that near the point q the second fundamental form is given by hij=μgij,where μ is equal to the mean curvature. But, mutatis mutandis in Lemma 3.3 of follow that H is constant on Σ, so is μ, this also appeared recently in Corollary 3.2 of . In particular, R1jkl=0 at q when {j,k,l}={2,3,4}. Proceeding, we can apply the same arguments used by Chen‐Wang in the proof of Lemma to conclude that Wq=0 provided q is not critical point of f .…”
Section: Proof Of Theoremmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…where μ is equal to the mean curvature. But, mutatis mutandis in Lemma 3.3 of [4] follow that H is constant on , so is μ, this also appeared recently in Corollary 3.2 of [17]. In particular, R 1 jkl = 0 at q when { j, k, l} = {2, 3, 4}.…”
Section: Proof Of Theorem 13mentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation