1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0168-1591(99)00018-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A note on simulating the `observer effect' using constant photoperiod on nursery pigs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, access to artificial light could alter their behavior. As reported by Lay et al (1999), pigs with constant access to light were more active between 1830 and 0630 h than pigs subjected to a 12 h light-12 h dark cycle. To our best knowledge, there are no studies that reported pigs' activity in a pen with daylight access and artificial light illuminating the weighing scale in the pen.…”
supporting
confidence: 62%
“…However, access to artificial light could alter their behavior. As reported by Lay et al (1999), pigs with constant access to light were more active between 1830 and 0630 h than pigs subjected to a 12 h light-12 h dark cycle. To our best knowledge, there are no studies that reported pigs' activity in a pen with daylight access and artificial light illuminating the weighing scale in the pen.…”
supporting
confidence: 62%
“…Although nighttime illumination Zoo Biology DOI 10.1002/zoo seems to alter the nocturnal behavior of some animals, such as pigs and bulls [Nicks et al, 1988;Lay et al, 1999], the effect of nighttime illumination on captive cetaceans is largely unknown. Under two 500-W aerial lamps (illuminance unavailable), Lyamin et al [2000] found that resting in a captive gray whale (Eschrichtius robustus) was observed mainly at night.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lay et al (1999) also showed that weaned piglets subjected to 24 h of daily light were more active between 1830 and 0630 than piglets subjected to 12 h of daily light, and tended to be more active during the entire day. One could postulate that the increased activity level of TRT piglets, leading to greater energy expenditure, may have masked any beneficial effect that the long photoperiod may have had on sow milk yield.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%