2014
DOI: 10.2996/kmj/1414674615
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A note on parabolic power concavity

Abstract: We investigate parabolic power concavity properties of the solutions of the heat equation in W Â ½0; TÞ, where W ¼ R n or W is a bounded convex domain in R n .

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This type of concavity results was established in [29] and [30] (see also [27,28]). Note that (1.6) then turns into a concavity assumption for g λ .…”
supporting
confidence: 55%
“…This type of concavity results was established in [29] and [30] (see also [27,28]). Note that (1.6) then turns into a concavity assumption for g λ .…”
supporting
confidence: 55%
“…Reults similar to ours have been shown in [BS13] for very general operators and in [Kul17] for the fractional Laplacian ∆ 1 2 in the planar case. Power concavity for parabolic equations was discussed in [IS14] and [Zha17]. To prove the desired power concavity, we use the comparison principle [LW08b, Theorem 1.3, Theorem 2.4] and show that the convex envelope of the function −u α+1 α+2 coincides with the function itself.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also address the study of geometric properties of the solution of problem (1.2), focusing on convexity in the space variable x (see Section 4). In the classical case s = 1 we know that the heat flow preserves convexity: quoting [18], "it is easily seen that, when Ω = R N , every solution of [the heat equation] with moderate growth at space infinity preserves the spatial concavity of [the initial datum] at any time t > 0". We prove that a similar result holds in the fractional case s ∈ (1/2, 1), and give precise statements in Theorem 4.7 and Theorem 4.8.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%