2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.orl.2016.07.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A note on non-degenerate integer programs with small sub-determinants

Abstract: The intention of this note is two-fold. First, we study integer optimization problems in standard form defined by A ∈ Z m×n and present an algorithm to solve such problems in polynomial-time provided that both the largest absolute value of an entry in A and m are constant. Then, this is applied to solve integer programs in inequality form in polynomial-time, where the absolute values of all maximal sub-determinants of A lie between 1 and a constant.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
48
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A consequence of Corollary 2 is that almost all problems can be solved in polynomial time provided ∆ is constant. This consequence can also be derived from a classic dynamic programming result by Gomory involving the so-called group relaxation [11] as well as from the dynamic programs presented in [1] or [9]. The running time of the latter has lesser dependence on ∆ than our approach in Corollary 2.…”
Section: The Value Pr(a) Can Be Interpreted As the Likelihood That Thmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…A consequence of Corollary 2 is that almost all problems can be solved in polynomial time provided ∆ is constant. This consequence can also be derived from a classic dynamic programming result by Gomory involving the so-called group relaxation [11] as well as from the dynamic programs presented in [1] or [9]. The running time of the latter has lesser dependence on ∆ than our approach in Corollary 2.…”
Section: The Value Pr(a) Can Be Interpreted As the Likelihood That Thmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Let the matrix H have the additional property, such that H has no singular n× n submatrices. One result of [5] states that if n ≥ f (∆), then the matrix H has at most n + 1 rows, where f (∆) is a function that depends on ∆ only. The paper [5] contains a super-polynomial estimate on the value of f (∆).…”
Section: Some Auxiliary Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second aim of our paper is to improve results of [5]. Namely, in Section 4, we will present a FPT-algorithm for the ILPP ∆ , when the constraints matrix is close to a square matrix, i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations