2017
DOI: 10.1017/s0308210517000191
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A note on multiplicative functions on progressions to large moduli

Abstract: Abstract. Let f : N → C be a bounded multiplicative function. Let a be a fixed nonzero integer (say a = 1). Then f is welldistributed on the progression n ≡ a(mod q) ⊂ {1, . . . , X}, for almost all primes q ∈ [Q, 2Q], for Q as large as X 1 2 + 1 78 −o(1) .

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(26 reference statements)
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since F (pm) is supported on pm ≥ Z 9 , we may add the restriction m ≥ Z 8 to the sum. By Lemma 2.1 of [21] we have…”
Section: 1mentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since F (pm) is supported on pm ≥ Z 9 , we may add the restriction m ≥ Z 8 to the sum. By Lemma 2.1 of [21] we have…”
Section: 1mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Breaking the x 1/2 -barrier. The main method used in our proofs is a modification of that developed by Green in [21]; see also [29] for using a similar argument to deal with higher Gowers norms. Green proved (a more general result which implies) that…”
Section: 4mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We note in passing that in the literature there are numerous results, valid in the middle range q ≤ x θ , that go beyond θ = 1/2 (especially for f (n) = Λ(n) or f (n) = µ(n)), provided that one restricts 5 to a fixed 6 residue class a (mod q), and in some cases also adds a "wellfactorable" weight to the sum (as in [3]), or specializes to smooth q (as in [47], [37]). A result of this shape for general multiplicative functions was proved by Granville and Shao [13,Theorem 1.8] (generalizing work of Green [15]), who showed that if a ∈ [1, 2Q] is fixed, then for all but Q/(log x)…”
Section: Introduction and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Unfortunately we cannot directly apply [4, Proposition 2.2], since for example our function F is not necessarily bounded. In the remainder of this section we reproduce the argument from [4] with suitable modifications to prove (3.1). Recall the definition of Ramaré's weight function:…”
Section: The Minor Arc Case: Proof Of Proposition 21mentioning
confidence: 99%