2007
DOI: 10.1007/s00453-007-9129-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Note on Multiflows and Treewidth

Abstract: We consider multicommodity flow problems in capacitated graphs where the treewidth of the underlying graph is bounded by r. The parameter r is allowed to be a function of the input size. An instance of the problem consists of a capacitated graph and a collection of terminal pairs. Each terminal pair has a non-negative demand that is to be routed between the nodes in the pair. A class of optimization problems is obtained when the goal is to route a maximum number of the pairs in the graph subject to the capacit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(63 reference statements)
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For MAX EDP, we have a constant factor integrality gap with congestion 2 for planar graphs. In [8] it is shown that the integrality gap of the LP for MAX EDP in graphs of treewidth at most k is O(k log k log n); note that this is with congestion 1. Existing integrality gap results, when interpreted in terms of treewidth k, show that the integrality gap is Ω(k) for congestion 1 and Ω(log O(1/c) k) for congestion c > 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For MAX EDP, we have a constant factor integrality gap with congestion 2 for planar graphs. In [8] it is shown that the integrality gap of the LP for MAX EDP in graphs of treewidth at most k is O(k log k log n); note that this is with congestion 1. Existing integrality gap results, when interpreted in terms of treewidth k, show that the integrality gap is Ω(k) for congestion 1 and Ω(log O(1/c) k) for congestion c > 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was asked in [8] whether the gap is O(k) with congestion 1. In particular, the question of whether the gap is O(1) for k = 2 (this is precisely the class of series parallel graphs) was open.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this paper (Section 4.3), we show that the integer flow cut gap in this case is c O(k) . In this effort, we explicitly employ a second proof ingredient which is a simple rerouting lemma that was stated and used in [9] (see Section 4.2). Informally speaking the lemma says the following.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The best known approximation for MEDP is O( √ n) [11], and there is a matching approximation for MNDP [39]; here n is the number of nodes in the input graph. Various special classes of graphs have been studied; constant factor and poly-logarithmic factor approximations for MEDP are known for trees [26,15], graphs with bounded treewidth [13], grids and grid-like graphs [34,37,38], Eulerian planar graphs [35,31], graphs with good expansion [5,24,36,40], and graphs with large global minimum cut [46]. MEDP and MNDP with congestion have also been well-studied, especially given the integrality gap of the flow relaxation; it is known that randomized rounding techniques give an O(d 1/c ) approximation, where d is the maximum flow path length in the fractional solution and c is the congestion parameter [53,39,4,6]; this holds even for directed graphs and it leads to an O(n 1/c ) approximation.…”
Section: High-level Overview Of Algorithm and Technical Contributionmentioning
confidence: 99%