2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0305-0548(00)00026-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A note on minimizing absolute percentage error in combined forecasts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To systematically examine the performance of different models by statistical error measures and characteristics of precipitation process error, we include results with two widely used prediction error metrics: Symmetric Mean Absolute Percentage Error (SMAPE) [41] and Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) [42].…”
Section: Evaluating the Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…To systematically examine the performance of different models by statistical error measures and characteristics of precipitation process error, we include results with two widely used prediction error metrics: Symmetric Mean Absolute Percentage Error (SMAPE) [41] and Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) [42].…”
Section: Evaluating the Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…To obtain the weights to build the combination of forecasts that minimises the MAPE, we proceed by extending the approach suggested by Lam et al (2001) …”
Section: Minimising the Mape In Combined Forecastsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, in this paper, the computational experiments performed in García-Martos et al (2007, 2012 are extended twofold: first, we do not impose the constraint about fitting the same model for every hour, which could give a sub-optimal solution in terms of prediction accuracy. Second, for those hours in which several models are not significantly different in terms of their accuracy, an optimal combination of forecasts (Bates and Granger, 1969) based on minimising the out-of-sample Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE) is built by extending the ideas in Lam et al (2001). The technique of combining forecasts has been used by several authors for computing forecasts of interest in the energy sector, but these forecasts mainly involve load and wind power production (see Taylor and Majithia, 2000;Sánchez, 2006 and2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kolassa (2011) combined exponential smoothing forecasts using Akaike weights to perform better than forecasts selected using information criteria, in terms of accuracy and interval coverage. Lam et al (2001) proposed two new approaches of combination 647 PSO-BP neural network forecasts, which minimized absolute percentage error by use of minimizing mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) or minimizing the maximum absolute percentage error. Jeong and Kim (2009) provided a guideline for combining methods, in which bias and non-stationary of the errors in individual forecasts, the ration of the error variance of any two forecasts and cross-correlation among the forecasts should be considered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%