1982
DOI: 10.1109/tac.1982.1103087
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A note on low-order modeling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…175 Occasionally, women participated in these "sinister practices, sometimes devouring the enemy's liver to avenge a husband or brother has killed in battle". 176 Th is practice was refl ected in the battle of Uhud, where Hind, mother of Caliph Muawia, "indulged" in this sort of mutilation of "enemy corpses". 177 In particular, Hind concentrated on Hamza, the uncle, of the Prophet, by eviscerating him and crushing his liver.…”
Section: Practices Of Torture and Reprisalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…175 Occasionally, women participated in these "sinister practices, sometimes devouring the enemy's liver to avenge a husband or brother has killed in battle". 176 Th is practice was refl ected in the battle of Uhud, where Hind, mother of Caliph Muawia, "indulged" in this sort of mutilation of "enemy corpses". 177 In particular, Hind concentrated on Hamza, the uncle, of the Prophet, by eviscerating him and crushing his liver.…”
Section: Practices Of Torture and Reprisalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 1974, a new model order abatement method called the Padé approximation was proposed (Shamash, 1974). The Padé approximation technology is a convenient method for the matching of starting few time moments of the abated model to the original system and also for the matching of steady-state responses (Ashoor and Singh, 1982; Prajapati et al, 2018). Sometimes, the abated system obtained by the Padé approximation scheme is unstable even though the original model is stable and it is the major limitation of this method (Prajapati and Prasad, 2018a; Shamash, 1974).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This limitation is circumvented by a method known as the Routh stability method (Krishnamurthy and Seshadri, 1978). In this method, the first few Markov parameters of the original system and the ROM are approximately similar, due to this the transient responses of the actual plant and the ROM are approximately matched (Ashoor and Singh, 1982; Prajapati et al, 2018). Sometimes, the Routh stability algorithm gives the same abated model for the different large-scale models and this non-uniqueness is discussed in Prajapati and Prasad (2018d) and Singh (1979).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among these approaches, Pade approximation (Prajapati and Prasad, 2018a; Shamash, 1974), is a frequently applied system diminution methodology and it is an appropriate scheme for the resembling of the static response of the approximated lower order system and original model. However, this methodology fails to keep the stability of some class of large scale original models into its equivalent reduced model (Ashoor and Singh, 1982; Prajapati et al, 2018). In order to circumvent this drawback several mixed model diminution techniques exist in the literature (Chen et al, 1980; Pal, 1979; Prasad, 2000; Vishwakarma and Prasad, 2008; Wan, 1981).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to circumvent this drawback several mixed model diminution techniques exist in the literature (Chen et al, 1980; Pal, 1979; Prasad, 2000; Vishwakarma and Prasad, 2008; Wan, 1981). Routh stability (Krishnamurthy and Seshadri, 1978) is another methodology for the diminution of complex linear systems and it is a convenient scheme for the resembling of the transient behavior of the complex system and its equivalent simplified model (Ashoor and Singh, 1982; Prajapati et al, 2018). This approach also has some drawbacks such as non-uniqueness (this method may give a similar reduced order system for different complex models) and unable to keep the dominant roots in the lower order system for the non-minimum higher order plants (Shamash, 1980; Singh, 1979).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%