2002
DOI: 10.1006/jsvi.2002.5023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Note on Finite Difference Estimation of Acoustic Particle Velocity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To obtain measurements over the broad frequency range examined here, we use three different experimental setups, each designed to cover a portion of the frequency range. The fluctuating airflow from 100 Hz to 50 kHz near the silk is determined using a measure of the spatial gradient of the pressure, ∂p(x, t)/∂x (36). Knowing the sound-pressure gradient, the acoustic particle velocity v a (x, t) is calculated using Euler's equation: −∂p(x, t)/∂x = ρ 0 ∂v a (x, t)/∂t, where ρ 0 is the air density.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To obtain measurements over the broad frequency range examined here, we use three different experimental setups, each designed to cover a portion of the frequency range. The fluctuating airflow from 100 Hz to 50 kHz near the silk is determined using a measure of the spatial gradient of the pressure, ∂p(x, t)/∂x (36). Knowing the sound-pressure gradient, the acoustic particle velocity v a (x, t) is calculated using Euler's equation: −∂p(x, t)/∂x = ρ 0 ∂v a (x, t)/∂t, where ρ 0 is the air density.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The occurrence of negative active acoustic power in Figure 13, can possibly be explained by amplitude and phase errors caused by the aforementioned diffraction between 4and 6kHz of the probe. Jacobsen [27] found that measurement of the active acoustic intensity in reactive sound fields is very sensitive to such errors.…”
Section: Microphone (8x) Spacermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 However, until recently measurement of the total sound energy density has required an elaborate arrangement based on finite-difference approximations using at least four pressure microphones. [6][7][8][9] The microphones should be amplitude and phase matched very well, and the signal-to-noise ratio is poor because the finitedifference signals should be time integrated, 10 which is perhaps one of the reasons why the method has not been used much in practice. With the advent of a three-dimensional particle velocity transducer, "Microflown," 11 it has become somewhat easier to measure kinetic and total rather than only potential energy density in a sound field, as demonstrated a few years ago.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%