1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0167-7152(97)00030-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A note on equality of MINQUE and simple estimator in the general Gauss-Markov model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The latter result was generalized by Kurata (1998). See also Groß (1997). In this paper, we generalize their result by considering the case in whicĥ…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…The latter result was generalized by Kurata (1998). See also Groß (1997). In this paper, we generalize their result by considering the case in whicĥ…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…The equivalences of (i) and (ii) in Theorem 2.2(a) and (b) were given by Groß [1]. Theorem 2.2 shows that under the conditions in (ii) and (iii), we can use the SE instead of the MINQUE, while the SE has the same optimal statistical properties as the MINQUE.…”
Section: Equality For the Se And Minque In The Original Modelmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…If the random vector y in (1.1) is normally distributed, then SE M (σ 2 ) has χ 2 (f )-distribution if and only if E X E X = E X , see Rao and Mitra [6]. More discussion on the distributions of SE M (σ 2 ) and MINQUE M (σ 2 ) can be found in Groß [1]. Also note from (2.1) and (2.2) that the SE of the variance component σ 2 involves no , but does the MINQUE.…”
Section: Equality For the Se And Minque In The Original Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some authors studied statistical properties of σ 2 s when V has some special structures, see, for example, [2,4]. Groß [3] established some necessary and sufficient conditions for the equality σ 2 m = σ 2 s when X and V can be deficient in rank, without the normality assumption of error distribution. The object of the present note is to make further comparison of these two estimates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%