2003
DOI: 10.1007/s10690-005-4248-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Note on Credit Risk of Vertical Keiretsu Firms: Preliminary Evidence from the Japanese Automobile Industry

Abstract: This paper empirically examines the relationship between the credit risk of Toyota, Nissan and Honda keiretsu-affiliated firms and the credit risk of the respective parent company. As credit spread data for keiretsu-affiliated firms were not available we create a keiretsu default index, as a proxy, using expected default probabilities obtained from the KMV and Leland and Toft (J. Finance 51, 987–1019, 1996) option pricing models. We find parent credit spreads do not Granger cause our keiretsu default index and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The option amount is a put option at the exercise price, and the shareholder is equivalent to holding a call option with the company's assets. Assuming that the company's assets obey the Itô process ( 32 , 37 ), the distribution law of assets can be obtained, followed by the company's expected default rate.…”
Section: Data Source and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The option amount is a put option at the exercise price, and the shareholder is equivalent to holding a call option with the company's assets. Assuming that the company's assets obey the Itô process ( 32 , 37 ), the distribution law of assets can be obtained, followed by the company's expected default rate.…”
Section: Data Source and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The smaller the probability of default is, the lower the credit risk. When the value of the company's assets is less than the point of default, the default distance is negative, and it is considered that the company does not breach the contract ( 32 , 33 , 37 ). This approach is the analysis basis and conclusion support for the empirical results obtained later.…”
Section: Data Source and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%