Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2015
DOI: 10.4171/rlm/708
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A note on compactness properties of the singular Toda system

Abstract: In this note, we consider blow-up for solutions of the SU (3) Toda system on a compact surface Σ. In particular, we give a complete proof of the compactness result stated by Jost, Lin and Wang in [11] and we extend it to the case of singularities. This is a necessary tool to find solutions through variational methods.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More precisely, if we have blow up at a regular point x R ∈ M \ S for a sequence (u n ) n of solutions to (1.2), it holds where a k will be defined in (1.4). By some further analysis, see for example [6,4,8,34], from the above quantization result it follows that the set of solutions to (1.2) is uniformly bounded in C 2,β for any fixed β ∈ (0, 1) provided that ρ / ∈ Σ. Thus, the Leray-Schauder degree d ρ of (1.2) is well-defined for ρ / ∈ Σ.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…More precisely, if we have blow up at a regular point x R ∈ M \ S for a sequence (u n ) n of solutions to (1.2), it holds where a k will be defined in (1.4). By some further analysis, see for example [6,4,8,34], from the above quantization result it follows that the set of solutions to (1.2) is uniformly bounded in C 2,β for any fixed β ∈ (0, 1) provided that ρ / ∈ Σ. Thus, the Leray-Schauder degree d ρ of (1.2) is well-defined for ρ / ∈ Σ.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Using Green's representation formulas, in [7] it was proved that in case of blow-up at least one component u i must accumulate at a finite number of points, and therefore the corresponding limiting parameter ρ i must be quantized, according to Theorem 1.4. As a consequence, one finds the following result.…”
Section: Theorem 14 ([25])mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We need to show that f ≡ 0, which will be done arguing as in [8] (Lemmas 2.2 and 2.3). If f ≡ 0, then one easily sees that f = V e w , with V := ρ…”
Section: Corollary 22mentioning
confidence: 99%