1989
DOI: 10.1016/0031-3203(89)90045-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A note on binary template matching

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
49
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors conclude about some close relationships among several measures. In the DIA field, the common used measures [3], [4], [5] are the IP , Jaccard, DICE, RU SS, KU L, Hamming, SM , RT , CORR and the Y ule ones (Table I). Taxonomy of the measures is discussed in these different papers.…”
Section: Binary Similarity Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The authors conclude about some close relationships among several measures. In the DIA field, the common used measures [3], [4], [5] are the IP , Jaccard, DICE, RU SS, KU L, Hamming, SM , RT , CORR and the Y ule ones (Table I). Taxonomy of the measures is discussed in these different papers.…”
Section: Binary Similarity Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, the goal is to improve performance by optimizing the similarity measure rather than distance. The weights can be obtained using an optimization method such as genetic algorithms, or assigned to matches according to their relative frequency of occurrence [3]. The typical similarity measures with weighting are the weighted inner product S W IP or the weighted Hamming D W H .…”
Section: Binary Similarity Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations