2017
DOI: 10.1002/qj.3076
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A note on apparent solar time and the seasonal cycle of atmospheric solar tides

Abstract: Both observations and comprehensive model simulation data of atmospheric fields are generally available at fixed Mean Solar Times through the day, which is convenient as the notional ‘mean sun’ progresses around the Earth each day in exactly 24 h. This article reports on a simple investigation of the effect of correcting data taken in Mean Solar Time to account for the difference in position between the actual (or ‘apparent’) sun and the mean sun, with a focus on characterizing atmospheric tidal oscillations. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the SABER results are noisy, all data sets basically show that the amplitude max- imizes twice in December-January-February and in JuneJuly-August in the upper stratosphere and the lower mesosphere. In the lower and middle stratosphere, by contrast, the amplitude minimizes during June-July-August; notably, this is similar to the seasonality of surface pressure tides (e.g., Díaz-Argandoña et al, 2016;Hamilton and Sakazaki, 2017). Such seasonality in the stratosphere was reported earlier by Li et al (2015) using the CFSR reanalysis.…”
Section: Semidiurnal (S 2 ) Migrating Tidesupporting
confidence: 80%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although the SABER results are noisy, all data sets basically show that the amplitude max- imizes twice in December-January-February and in JuneJuly-August in the upper stratosphere and the lower mesosphere. In the lower and middle stratosphere, by contrast, the amplitude minimizes during June-July-August; notably, this is similar to the seasonality of surface pressure tides (e.g., Díaz-Argandoña et al, 2016;Hamilton and Sakazaki, 2017). Such seasonality in the stratosphere was reported earlier by Li et al (2015) using the CFSR reanalysis.…”
Section: Semidiurnal (S 2 ) Migrating Tidesupporting
confidence: 80%
“…For reanalyses, 3-or 6-hourly diurnal variations in UT are extracted at each grid point through composite analysis based on UT after the subtraction of the daily mean; in fact, we downloaded and analyzed the diurnal monthly mean (monthly mean for each UTC snapshot) data provided by each reanalysis center (e.g., for JRA-55, diurnal monthly mean data are the monthly averages for 00:00, 06:00, 12:00, and 18:00 UTC). Clearly the 6-hourly data (ERA-Interim, JRA-55, and CFSR) cannot resolve S 2 at each grid point, but the "migrating component" of S 2 can be extracted by using data at grid points on the same latitude belt, as explained in the following (Ray and Ponte, 2003;Díaz-Argandoña et al, 2016;Hamilton and Sakazaki, 2017).…”
Section: Migrating and Nonmigrating Tidesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For reanalyses, 3-or 6-hourly diurnal variations in UT are extracted at each grid point through composite analysis based on UT after the subtraction of the daily mean; in fact, we downloaded and analyzed the diurnal monthly mean (monthly mean for each UTC snapshot) data provided by each reanalysis center (e.g., for JRA-55, diurnal monthly mean data are the monthly averages for 00:00, 06:00, 12:00, and 18:00 UTC). Clearly the 6-hourly data (ERA-Interim, JRA-55, and CFSR) cannot resolve S 2 at each grid point, but the "migrating component" of S 2 can be extracted by using data at grid points on the same latitude belt, as explained in the following (Ray and Ponte, 2003;Díaz-Argandoña et al, 2016;Hamilton and Sakazaki, 2017).…”
Section: Migrating and Nonmigrating Tidesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only a few studies have examined S 2 tides in reanalyses (although the solar S 2 surface pressure oscillation has been more extensively studied; e.g., Ray and Ponte, 2003;Saha et al, 2010;Díaz-Argandoña et al, 2016;Hamilton and Sakazaki, 2017). Hsu and Hoskins (1989) and Kohyama and Wallace (2014) derived S 2 migrating tides in the stratosphere by using the ECMWF operational analysis and the ERA-Interim, respectively. Li et al (2015) used CFSR reanalysis to examine the seasonality of S 2 migrating tides.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%