1978
DOI: 10.1080/03081087808817226
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A note on an inverse problem for nonnegative matrices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
132
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 163 publications
(134 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
132
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The condition (6) follows simply from the fact that tr(A k ) is the kth moment of the eigenvalue sequence of A, while the condition (7) is due to Loewy and London [10] and, independently, Johnson [7].…”
Section: Lemma 3 With the Notation Of Lemma 2 T(m)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The condition (6) follows simply from the fact that tr(A k ) is the kth moment of the eigenvalue sequence of A, while the condition (7) is due to Loewy and London [10] and, independently, Johnson [7].…”
Section: Lemma 3 With the Notation Of Lemma 2 T(m)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…pdf). Readers also may refer to [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26] for some previous results. In some articles, some necessary conditions and sufficient conditions for the three problems above have been given under some small dimension or special cases [7].…”
Section: Problem 3 (Sniep)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A short list of references giving various necessary or sufficient conditions includesBarrett and Johnson (1984), Boyle and Handelman (1991), Friedland (1978), Friedland and Melkman (1979), Loewy and London (1978), de Oliveira (1983), and Reams (1996). The difficulty is that the necessary condition is usually too general and the sufficient condition too specific.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For n ≥ 5 the problem remains unsolved. In the general case, when the possible spectrum Λ is a set of complex numbers, the problem has only been solved for n = 3 by Loewy and London [11]. The complex cases n = 4 and n = 5 have been solved for matrices of trace zero by Reams [17] and Laffey and Meehan [10], respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%