2012
DOI: 10.1002/col.21733
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A note about the abnormal hue angle change in CIELAB space

Abstract: Liu et al. [Color Res Appl 1995;20:245–250] compared the CIELAB hue angles under CIE illuminants D65 and A for quantifying the color appearance changes for gem materials. They found that CIELAB hue angle for some gem materials under illuminant D65 was larger than under A, which is contrary to the perceived blue and purple appearances under daylight and incandescent light sources, respectively. They called this phenomenon as the abnormal hue angle change in the CIELAB space for the gem materials. In this articl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(33 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(10). Thus, the chromaticity coordinates of the blue primary, denoted as P 12 , is the intersection point of the first and second lines in Eq. (10); the green primary, denoted as P 13 , is the intersection point of the first and third lines in Eq.…”
Section: Definitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…(10). Thus, the chromaticity coordinates of the blue primary, denoted as P 12 , is the intersection point of the first and second lines in Eq. (10); the green primary, denoted as P 13 , is the intersection point of the first and third lines in Eq.…”
Section: Definitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is indeed the case. In fact, if we let P be the convex combination of the two primary points P 12 Here, a and b satisfy:…”
Section: Cat02 Matrix Hpe Matrixmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…First, the initial guess for the two variables were chosen at the centers of the intervals established by Eqs. (29) and (30). However, the automatic output message from MATLAB alerted us "local minimum possible, constraints satisfied" with u 0 R 50.6234 and u 0 G 520.2871, and the objective function F(u 0 R , u 0 G ) had a value of 6.4791.…”
Section: The Optimum Solutionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…and it must be minimized, with variables u 0 R and u 0 G satisfying Eqs. (29) and (30) respectively.…”
Section: Fitting the Visual Experimental Datamentioning
confidence: 99%