2021
DOI: 10.5194/gmd-2021-176
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Norwegian Approach to Downscaling

Abstract: Abstract. A description of a comprehensive geoscientific downscaling model strategy is presented outlining an approach that has evolved over the last 20 years, together with an explanation for its development, its technical aspects, and evaluation scheme. This effort has resulted in an open-source and free R-based tool, 'esd', for the benefit of sharing and improving the reproducibility of the downscaling results. Furthermore, a set of new metrics was developed as an integral part of the downscaling approach w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
(96 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, it should be noticed that all ESD methods here evaluated operate at a daily scale (“downscaling weather”), but “downscaling climate” appears to be a promising approach, as parameters of the distributions are usually easier to predict than daily states and transferability issues might be palliated (Erlandsen et al ., 2020; Benestad, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Additionally, it should be noticed that all ESD methods here evaluated operate at a daily scale (“downscaling weather”), but “downscaling climate” appears to be a promising approach, as parameters of the distributions are usually easier to predict than daily states and transferability issues might be palliated (Erlandsen et al ., 2020; Benestad, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Erlandsen et al . (2020) evaluated an ESD method based on “downscaling climate” instead of “downscaling weather,” which consists in estimating parameters of the distributions instead of daily data (Benestad, 2021). They combined this approach with the use of common EOFs (Benestad, 2001; 2021) using a convective permitting RCM over the emissive scenario RCP8.5 (see IPCC, 2013) and found a significant sensitivity to the predictors choice and to the calibration period.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, employing a small number of global climate models for projecting regional or local future climate is prone to result in misleading outlooks. It is possible to account for such regional internal model variability by using large ensembles of global climate model simulations (Benestad, 2021). Proper consideration of climate uncertainty and variability might be done when output from large (e.g., 30–100 member) ensembles of global climate models are downscaled to regional climate projections that are all propagated into a distribution of plausible risks that comprehensively represent the combined uncertainty and variability of future climate conditions, chemical exposures, and environmental effects (Moe et al, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%