2022
DOI: 10.1017/cjn.2021.513
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Normative Brain MRI Database of Neurotypical Participants from 5 to 90 Years of Age

Abstract: Brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies of clinical populations often require comparison to a normative ‘control’ cohort, usually of similar age/sex, scanned with the same protocol. The goal here was to create a normative brain MRI database of common quantitative methods to be used in comparisons with a variety of neurological disorders across the lifespan. 378 neurotypical controls (aged 5–90 years; median 31 years; 216 females, 162 males) completed brain MRI, cognitive testing, clinical assessment, an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The local healthy participant study was approved by the Human Research Ethics Board at the University of Alberta with written informed consent (and assent for children). First, test-retest diffusion data were acquired from 24 healthy participants (29 ± 8 (20 - 48) years; 13 females) on a 3T Siemens Prisma (64 channel head and neck coil) as part of the University of Alberta normative brain imaging database (Treit et al, 2023). Diffusion tensor imaging was acquired with a single-shot EPI spin-echo sequence: multi-band=2, GRAPPA R=2, 6/8 partial Fourier, 10 b0 s/mm 2 , 6 b500 s/mm 2 (not used here), 20 b1000 s/mm 2 , 64 b2500 s/mm 2 (not used here), TR=5160 ms, TE=67 ms, FOV=220 mm, 96 1.5 mm slices with no gap, 1.5×1.5 mm 2 , reconstructed over the 64 channels using sum of squares, with an acquisition time of 9:29 min (or 2:51 min for only the b0 and b1000 shells used for this study).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The local healthy participant study was approved by the Human Research Ethics Board at the University of Alberta with written informed consent (and assent for children). First, test-retest diffusion data were acquired from 24 healthy participants (29 ± 8 (20 - 48) years; 13 females) on a 3T Siemens Prisma (64 channel head and neck coil) as part of the University of Alberta normative brain imaging database (Treit et al, 2023). Diffusion tensor imaging was acquired with a single-shot EPI spin-echo sequence: multi-band=2, GRAPPA R=2, 6/8 partial Fourier, 10 b0 s/mm 2 , 6 b500 s/mm 2 (not used here), 20 b1000 s/mm 2 , 64 b2500 s/mm 2 (not used here), TR=5160 ms, TE=67 ms, FOV=220 mm, 96 1.5 mm slices with no gap, 1.5×1.5 mm 2 , reconstructed over the 64 channels using sum of squares, with an acquisition time of 9:29 min (or 2:51 min for only the b0 and b1000 shells used for this study).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To assess age related DTI parameter trajectories in 6 deep GM structures, diffusion data were acquired from two separate lifespan cohorts. The first cohort (cohort #1), included 382 subjects recruited under the University of Alberta normative brain imaging database (Treit et al, 2023) and were scanned with the same 1.5 mm isotropic diffusion imaging and T1-weighted MPRAGE protocols as the test-retest cohort above. Amongst these individuals, 365 (38 ± 23 (5-90) years; 209 females) completed adequate diffusion and structural imaging for the proposed analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The healthy lifespan dataset includes 856 healthy participants (ages 5—91 years, 367 (43%) males) who were scanned once at one of these three sites (Site 1: UofA n = 534, Site 2: ACH n = 52, Site 3: FMC n = 270; Table 1 ). Healthy development participants were recruited separately at each site as part of independent studies of typical brain development and/or aging ( 13 , 14 ), through advertising and word of mouth, and were screened for psychiatric, neurological and developmental disorders as well as contraindications to MRI. Traveling phantom participants were recruited locally through word of mouth and were all familiar with undergoing MRI scans to ensure compliance (i.e., mostly graduate students from Edmonton and Calgary).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%