2011
DOI: 10.1038/nn.2815
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A normalization model of multisensory integration

Abstract: Responses of neurons that integrate multiple sensory inputs are traditionally characterized in terms of a set of empirical principles. However, a simple computational framework that accounts for these empirical features of multisensory integration has not been established. We propose that divisive normalization, acting at the stage of multisensory integration, can account for many of the empirical principles of multisensory integration exhibited by single neurons, such as the principle of inverse effectiveness… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

18
252
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 281 publications
(283 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
18
252
3
Order By: Relevance
“…More generally, a large body of behavioral literature shows that multisensory perceptual fusion can be robust over extended periods of cross-sensory asynchrony, without any apparent evidence for "cyclic" fluctuations in the coherence of the multisensory percept (5-7). Given the variety of multisensory response types elicited during periods in which stable perceptual fusion should occur, our results underscore the functional role of both enhanced and suppressed spiking responses (43,44). However, this perceptual robustness is in apparent contrast to the observed rhythmicity of neuronal integrative processes (8,9,25,30).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…More generally, a large body of behavioral literature shows that multisensory perceptual fusion can be robust over extended periods of cross-sensory asynchrony, without any apparent evidence for "cyclic" fluctuations in the coherence of the multisensory percept (5-7). Given the variety of multisensory response types elicited during periods in which stable perceptual fusion should occur, our results underscore the functional role of both enhanced and suppressed spiking responses (43,44). However, this perceptual robustness is in apparent contrast to the observed rhythmicity of neuronal integrative processes (8,9,25,30).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…Importantly, this finding is not inconsistent with the hypothesis of altered divisive normalization in autism since cue integration does not theoretically require divisive normalization (42). Altered divisive normalization in autism does, however, predict changes in other forms of multisensory processing that require divisive normalization, such as cue conflict conditions and causal inference (36,38).…”
Section: Multisensory Processingmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…It is also thought to adjust the gain of neural responses to efficiently make use of their dynamic range (15). Divisive normalization further accounts for a number of phenomena in auditory cortex (35), multisensory integration (36), and higher-order processes such as attention (37) and rationality (16). In addition, divisive normalization may be critical for neural circuits to implement marginalization, a type of probabilistic inference that eliminates irrelevant information, so-called "nuisance variables" (38).…”
Section: Connecting the E/i Balance To Neural Computationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The topedown generation process of the model drove activity in the sensory units by a weighted sum of memorized/internalized patterns; how much each pattern contributed to the sensory units was determined by the normalized activity of the supramodal recognition units at the top. Such normalization is a candidate basic operation in brain computations (Carandini & Heeger, 2012;Ohshiro, Angelaki, & DeAngelis, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%