1984
DOI: 10.1029/wr020i006p00727
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Nonparametric Trend Test for Seasonal Data With Serial Dependence

Abstract: Statistical tests for monotonic trend in seasonal (e.g., monthly) hydrologic time series are commonly confounded by some of the following problems: nonnormal data, missing values, seasonality, censoring (detection limits), and serial dependence. An extension of the Mann-Kendall test for trend (designed for such data) is presented here. Because the test is based entirely on ranks, it is robust against nonnormality and censoring. Seasonality and missing values present no theoretical or computational obstacles to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
833
0
13

Year Published

1994
1994
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,403 publications
(875 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
8
833
0
13
Order By: Relevance
“…The non-parametric Seasonal Kendall test (Hirsch and Slack, 1984;Loftis et al 1991) was used for detecting monotonic trends over the study period in the throughfall, soil water, groundwater, and streamwater chemistry time series. For tests of trends for the combined data (Loftis et al 1991) from all four IM sites, an Excel-program developed by Anders Grimvall, SLU and further extended and modified by Jens Fölster and Jan Seibert, SLU was used for the calculations (Fölster et al 2003a).…”
Section: Statistical Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The non-parametric Seasonal Kendall test (Hirsch and Slack, 1984;Loftis et al 1991) was used for detecting monotonic trends over the study period in the throughfall, soil water, groundwater, and streamwater chemistry time series. For tests of trends for the combined data (Loftis et al 1991) from all four IM sites, an Excel-program developed by Anders Grimvall, SLU and further extended and modified by Jens Fölster and Jan Seibert, SLU was used for the calculations (Fölster et al 2003a).…”
Section: Statistical Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Limitations of the MK test are that there must be no serial correlation for the resulting p-values to be correct, and that data must be monotonic. A few of authors mention the use of modifications of the MK method that account for autocorrelation [63,67,70,74]; the most usual modification is the one proposed by Hirsch and Slack [111]. It is not excluded that others account for autocorrelation without mentioning it.…”
Section: Trend Detection and Quantificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2) (after Hirsch and Slack, 1984). For cases the sample size n is larger than 10, the standard normal variate p is computed by using the following equation (see Douglas et al, 2000)…”
Section: Trends In Rainfall and Stream Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%