2009 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing 2009
DOI: 10.1109/icassp.2009.4960256
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A nonparametric test for stationarity based on local Fourier analysis

Abstract: In this paper we propose a nonparametric hypothesis test for stationarity based on local Fourier analysis. We employ a test statistic that measures the variation of time-localized estimates of the power spectral density of an observed random process. For the case of a white Gaussian noise process, we characterize the asymptotic distribution of this statistic under the null hypothesis of stationarity, and use it to directly set test thresholds corresponding to constant false alarm rates. For other cases, we int… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
(13 reference statements)
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other attempts have nevertheless been made in this direction too by contrasting local properties with global ones [4], [8], but not necessarily properly phrased in terms of hypothesis testing. Among more recent approaches, we can mention those reported in [9], [10] which share some ideas with this work, but with the notable difference that they are basically model-based (whereas ours is not). Early works [11], [12] proposed a global test of stationarity based on approximate statistics of evolutionary spectra [ 13], which is performed as a two-step analysis of variance.…”
supporting
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Other attempts have nevertheless been made in this direction too by contrasting local properties with global ones [4], [8], but not necessarily properly phrased in terms of hypothesis testing. Among more recent approaches, we can mention those reported in [9], [10] which share some ideas with this work, but with the notable difference that they are basically model-based (whereas ours is not). Early works [11], [12] proposed a global test of stationarity based on approximate statistics of evolutionary spectra [ 13], which is performed as a two-step analysis of variance.…”
supporting
confidence: 56%
“…One difference between theoretical (secondorder) stationarity of random processes and operational stationarity that we study, and that aims at being consistent with the physical and time-frequency interpretation of what stationarity means, is that both situations where there is no change in time of second-order statistics (here at microscale), and situations where there is a regular repetition if the same feature (here at macroscale of observation) are considered as being stationary in its operational acceptance. They are moreover quantified in the sense that, when the null hypothesis of stationarity is rejected (middle diagram), both an index and a scale of nonstationarity can be defined according to ( 10) and (11). In the present case, the maximum value of INS is obtained for SNS = T h /T ≈ 0.2, in qualitative accordance with the 4 AM periods entering the observation window.…”
Section: F Illustrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(43) Instead, we show that (43) holds for all t ∈ supp (T na w r )which, together with (42), is sufficient to establish (41), and consequently our claimed result.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Two main questions may be identified in this regard, the first is on how to select the length of the period where it is considered that the structural parameters remain more or less constant; the second is on how to represent the variability in the parameters as a function of the EOCs. The selection of the period of pseudoconstant dynamics may be obtained empirically by means of stationarity tests, as described for example in Kay (2008), Basu et al (2009), andBorgnat et al (2010). On the other hand, the representation of the variability in the dynamics of the structure as an effect of the EOCs is the main problem addressed in this work, for which a Gaussian Process Regression approach is postulated, as shown in the remainder of this work.…”
Section: Limitations Of the Traditional Linear Regressive Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%