2010
DOI: 10.1007/s10260-010-0147-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A nonparametric symmetry test for absolutely continuous bivariate copulas

Abstract: Based on the works by Klement and Mesiar (Comment Math Univ Carolinae 47:141-148, 2006) and Nelsen (Stat Pap 48:329-336, 2007) on maximal asymmetry of copulas, we define and study the concept of tri-symmetry and we propose a simple statistic to test symmetry of a bivariate copula, given a random sample of an absolutely continuous bivariate random vector. We also make a power comparison against some other well known nonparametric symmetry tests.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, a powerful nonparametric test of independence à la Deheuvels based on a Cramér-von Mises statistic [8] has been applied, see Table 13.2 for p-values, clearly rejecting independence for both the total sample and subsample 1, not rejecting independence for subsample 2, but with some doubts about rejecting independence in case of subsample 3, since there is no rule to decide if 0.1274 is a sufficiently low p-value to reject the null hypothesis. Fortunately, a nonparametric symmetry test [6] has been helpful for taking a final decision on subsample 3: by rejecting symmetry we have to reject independence. In terms of choosing a parametric copula, strong evidence against symmetry is challenging since there is not such a huge catalog of parametric asymmetric copulas as there is indeed for the symmetric case.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, a powerful nonparametric test of independence à la Deheuvels based on a Cramér-von Mises statistic [8] has been applied, see Table 13.2 for p-values, clearly rejecting independence for both the total sample and subsample 1, not rejecting independence for subsample 2, but with some doubts about rejecting independence in case of subsample 3, since there is no rule to decide if 0.1274 is a sufficiently low p-value to reject the null hypothesis. Fortunately, a nonparametric symmetry test [6] has been helpful for taking a final decision on subsample 3: by rejecting symmetry we have to reject independence. In terms of choosing a parametric copula, strong evidence against symmetry is challenging since there is not such a huge catalog of parametric asymmetric copulas as there is indeed for the symmetric case.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13.1 and 13.2), eventhough there was not strong evidence against the symmetry of the underlying copula [6], it was not possible to find a single known parametric family of copulas that could avoid being rejected by a goodness-of-fit-test (see Table 13.5), and an analogous situation for the marginal distributions. One way of tackling such situation is by a totally nonparametric approach, using Bernstein copula [15,16] and Bernstein marginals [12], but paying the price of a noisy regression (see Fig.…”
Section: Final Remarksmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…As a consequence, many tests of parametric and nonparametric symmetry tests are implemented. As a revealing example, we refer to [6] and the important paper of A. Erdely and J. M. Gonzàlez-Barrios [11] and in another and close context [13]. We mention also the attempt of dependence coefficient symmetrization as initiated by Cifarelli et al [7].…”
Section: Asymmetric Copulasmentioning
confidence: 99%