1997
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1520-6750(199710)44:7<655::aid-nav4>3.0.co;2-b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A nonparametric Bayes approach to decide system burn-in time

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More samples tested implies a higher confidence level can be achieved to guarantee a lower ppm level as shown in Eq. (15):…”
Section: Saving On Test Time and Test Resourcementioning
confidence: 99%
“…More samples tested implies a higher confidence level can be achieved to guarantee a lower ppm level as shown in Eq. (15):…”
Section: Saving On Test Time and Test Resourcementioning
confidence: 99%
“…By Eq. (1), given the bum-rn time to be x, the failure rate (in FIT, i09 device-hour) of a product after releasing for field use for y-hr is io ( F(x Acc+y) _F(xAcc) )/ y = i09 (exp(-(x Acc/a)) -exp(-((x Acc + y)/a)) )/ y (2) where Acc is the acceleration factor. The Acc is usually derived by multiplying the temperature (At) and voltage acceleration (Av) effect.…”
Section: Time Tmentioning
confidence: 99%