1993
DOI: 10.1080/00224065.1993.11979454
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Nonlinear Programming Solution to the Dual Response Problem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
96
0
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 251 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
96
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This approach is one of the basic approaches used in the multiple-objective decision-making problem. An example to such approaches can be found in the literature of response surface methodology (RSM) [3,9]. According to Kim et al [10], the main disadvantage of these approaches is that they do not conform to the basic idea of multiresponse surface optimization to simultaneously consider all of the responses.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach is one of the basic approaches used in the multiple-objective decision-making problem. An example to such approaches can be found in the literature of response surface methodology (RSM) [3,9]. According to Kim et al [10], the main disadvantage of these approaches is that they do not conform to the basic idea of multiresponse surface optimization to simultaneously consider all of the responses.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the optimisation of duel responses, Montgomery and Castillo (1993) suggested a non-linear programming solution. Myers and Carter (1973) proposed response surface techniques.…”
Section: Simultaneous Optimisation Of Response Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several ways to draw the optimal solution considering multiple individual desirability functions [22][23][24][25][26] but the most widely used method is to optimize by converting multiple desirability functions into single desirability. In most cases the concept of geometric means is often used for this aggregation.…”
Section: Desirability Function Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%