2018
DOI: 10.1137/17m1133580
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Nonlinear Method for Imaging with Acoustic Waves Via Reduced Order Model Backprojection

Abstract: We introduce a novel nonlinear imaging method for the acoustic wave equation based on datadriven model order reduction. The objective is to image the discontinuities of the acoustic velocity, a coefficient of the scalar wave equation from the discretely sampled time domain data measured at an array of transducers that can act as both sources and receivers. We treat the wave equation along with transducer functionals as a dynamical system. A reduced order model (ROM) for the propagator of such system can be com… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
53
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(2) For imaging scattering surfaces in a smooth reference medium, mostly in the context of reflection seismology [51,36] and a related setting in optics [38]. (3) For imaging almost layered media using the so-called Marchenko redatuming method [50], and also for imaging based on data-driven reduced order models [20,22]. This latter work is the foundation of the algorithm in this paper.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2) For imaging scattering surfaces in a smooth reference medium, mostly in the context of reflection seismology [51,36] and a related setting in optics [38]. (3) For imaging almost layered media using the so-called Marchenko redatuming method [50], and also for imaging based on data-driven reduced order models [20,22]. This latter work is the foundation of the algorithm in this paper.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second is based on the Gram-Schmidt orthogonalization of the snapshots. 13 3.1.1. Finite differences interpretation.…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore L andŜ are the same by the uniqueness of the inverse eigenvalue problem, and ĉ = V , from which the result follows. That is, the solution components U j of the difference scheme (15) can be interpreted as coefficients of the spectrally converging Galerkin solution with respect to the orthogonal basis (16). See Figure 2 for an example of an orthogonalized basis with its equivalent staggered finite difference grid.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If we change the basis to the orthogonalized(16) and form the Galerkin system in this new basis(17) (Ŝ + λM ) ĉ = F…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%