2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2018.05.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A nonlinear dynamic model and parameters identification method for predicting the shock pulse of rubber waveform generator

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We conduct drop shock test to collect shock signals. The experiment platform setting is based on our previous work in [17], which is also illustrated in Fig.1. The logic behind this drop shock test is simple: the drop table is lifted up and released, it falls freely along the guide columns and collides with the rubber waveform generator (RWG) to produce the shock signal.…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We conduct drop shock test to collect shock signals. The experiment platform setting is based on our previous work in [17], which is also illustrated in Fig.1. The logic behind this drop shock test is simple: the drop table is lifted up and released, it falls freely along the guide columns and collides with the rubber waveform generator (RWG) to produce the shock signal.…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Illustration of the drop test platform. Sensors are marked as "Accelerometer" mounted on the top of the drop table.Figure adaptedfrom[17].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…hock loading, especially the high-g level shock, is characterized as a transient transfer of massive energy to a system, which is very likely to seriously affect the performance of the system [1]. Many conditions, such as the release of space equipment [2], drop of electronic devices [3], and crashing of vehicles [4], are subjected to high-g shock excitations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lastly, these mapping methods cannot calibrate the entire time-domain shock signal but merely the peak value and/or pulse width of a shock signal [14]. Only the two parameters (peak value and pulse width), though they are two key parameters in conventional standard-waveform-based shock test [1], cannot describe the actual shock environment exactly. The shock response spectrum (SRS) method, which converts the entire time-domain shock signal into a frequency-domain spectrum, is proposed for signal characterization and replacing the standard-waveform-based shock test methods gradually, especially in pyroshock test [2], [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation