2015
DOI: 10.5194/nhess-15-2401-2015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A non-stationary earthquake probability assessment with the Mohr–Coulomb failure criterion

Abstract: Abstract. From theory to experience, earthquake probability associated with an active fault should be gradually increasing with time since the last event. In this paper, a new nonstationary earthquake assessment motivated/derived from the Mohr-Coulomb failure criterion is introduced. Different from other non-stationary earthquake analyses, the new model can more clearly define and calculate the stress states between two characteristic earthquakes. In addition to the model development and the algorithms, this p… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
(15 reference statements)
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The total stress models include the elastic-plastic model [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30], nonlinear model [22,31,32], and equivalent linear model [33]. Traditional elastoplastic models such as the Mohr-Coulomb model [34] and the Drucker-Prager model [35] can be integrated with the boundary interface theory [25][26][27], kinematic hardening theory [23,24], and nested yield surface theory [29,30] to account for the effects of cyclic loading. Although the elastoplastic model theory effectively describes the hysteresis characteristics and nonlinearity of soils, its computational complexity and significant workload make it inconvenient for engineering applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The total stress models include the elastic-plastic model [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30], nonlinear model [22,31,32], and equivalent linear model [33]. Traditional elastoplastic models such as the Mohr-Coulomb model [34] and the Drucker-Prager model [35] can be integrated with the boundary interface theory [25][26][27], kinematic hardening theory [23,24], and nested yield surface theory [29,30] to account for the effects of cyclic loading. Although the elastoplastic model theory effectively describes the hysteresis characteristics and nonlinearity of soils, its computational complexity and significant workload make it inconvenient for engineering applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%