2009
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-02498-6_37
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Non-rigid Registration Framework That Accommodates Resection and Retraction

Abstract: Traditional non-rigid registration algorithms are incapable of accurately registering intra-operative with pre-operative images whenever tissue has been resected or retracted. In this work we present methods for detecting and handling retraction and resection. The registration framework is based on the bijective Demons algorithm using an anisotropic diffusion smoother. Retraction is detected at areas of the deformation field with high internal strain and the estimated retraction boundary is integrated as a dif… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4 Methods to account for missing tissue have been proposed in the literature. 24,25 However, these methods are designed to include excision, resection, and retraction, with a direct application for surgery. In our case, the tumor shrinks due to the death of cells within the tissue, therefore, the use of these methods is limited.…”
Section: B Comparison With Other Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 Methods to account for missing tissue have been proposed in the literature. 24,25 However, these methods are designed to include excision, resection, and retraction, with a direct application for surgery. In our case, the tumor shrinks due to the death of cells within the tissue, therefore, the use of these methods is limited.…”
Section: B Comparison With Other Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that brain resections or the presence of neurosurgical instruments can also be regarded as topological changes in general. Several works are developed to register brain images with resections by matching subvolumes [27,28], landmarks [29] or segmentation surfaces [30]. In addition, the ExpectationMaximization (EM) framework has been used for a joint estimation of resection region and registration [31,32].…”
Section: Deformable Registration Algorithms For Images With Topologicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These works rely on local features, and in most cases, their registration results have limited dimensionality rather than a dense deformation field, due to the computational complexity of EM. The work by Risholm et al [29] uses anisotropic diffusion instead of Gaussian smoothing in a registration framework that generates a deformation field that is free of the impact from resections. In their work, the anisotropic diffusion is regulated by diffusion sinks, where it is permitted into the area (resection area) but not out.…”
Section: Deformable Registration Algorithms For Images With Topologicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resection area was detected by statistical learning on a training set based on the intensity values and deformed by interpolation (constant registration cost in the resection area). In the same clinical context, Risholm et al (2009) coupled the demons algorithm with level sets. They alternate segmentation of the resected area by evolving a level set based on the image gradient and intensities disagreements, with a demons based registration that accommodates the resection by only allowing displacement towards the area.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%