2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2005.01.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A non-rigid registration approach for quantifying myocardial contraction in tagged MRI using generalized information measures

Abstract: We address the problem of quantitatively assessing myocardial function from tagged MRI sequences. We develop a two-step method comprising (i) a motion estimation step using a novel variational non-rigid registration technique based on generalized information measures, and (ii) a measurement step, yielding local and segmental deformation parameters over the whole myocardium. Experiments on healthy and pathological data demonstrate that this method delivers, within a reasonable computation time and in a fully un… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We used a local feature vector with normalized components, comprising the greylevel, and the eigenvalues and eigenvectors of the structure tensor ∂ xτ I(x) T ∂ xτ I(x) G σ of the image I, computed at a Gaussian scale σ equal to the half-width of the tagging pattern (D = 5). We studied the impact on registration accuracy of using a directional local contrast descriptor by comparing performances with a similar registration model exploiting solely the greylevel information [12]. To be consistent with the later work, we considered an infinite dimensional (non-parametric) transform space, and a registration criterion combining Havrda-Charvát information (α = 1.2) and the Nagel-Enkelmann oriented smoothness stabilizer, and performed experiments on the SPAMM dataset used in [12].…”
Section: Estimating Myocardial Motion In Tagged Mri Using Pairwise Rementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We used a local feature vector with normalized components, comprising the greylevel, and the eigenvalues and eigenvectors of the structure tensor ∂ xτ I(x) T ∂ xτ I(x) G σ of the image I, computed at a Gaussian scale σ equal to the half-width of the tagging pattern (D = 5). We studied the impact on registration accuracy of using a directional local contrast descriptor by comparing performances with a similar registration model exploiting solely the greylevel information [12]. To be consistent with the later work, we considered an infinite dimensional (non-parametric) transform space, and a registration criterion combining Havrda-Charvát information (α = 1.2) and the Nagel-Enkelmann oriented smoothness stabilizer, and performed experiments on the SPAMM dataset used in [12].…”
Section: Estimating Myocardial Motion In Tagged Mri Using Pairwise Rementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed model has been applied to the estimation of myocardial deformations from tagged MRI exams by sequentially performing frame-to-frame registration [12]. We used a local feature vector with normalized components, comprising the greylevel, and the eigenvalues and eigenvectors of the structure tensor ∂ xτ I(x) T ∂ xτ I(x) G σ of the image I, computed at a Gaussian scale σ equal to the half-width of the tagging pattern (D = 5).…”
Section: Estimating Myocardial Motion In Tagged Mri Using Pairwise Rementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For maximizing Equation (2.9), an iterative variational displacement field is derived similarly to the method described by Hermosillo et al [32] and Rougon et al [33]. These two works describe a framework for optimizing an image similarity functional S depending on a displacement field u.…”
Section: Group-wise Non-rigid Alignmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As described in Hermosillo et al [32] and Rougon et al [33], the variational optimization of S is solved by looking for the displacement field that cancels the derivative in Equation (2.11). Such local minimum can be reached by iteratively composing the first variation given by Equation (2.18) with the current estimate of the displacement field.…”
Section: Group-wise Non-rigid Alignmentmentioning
confidence: 99%