2018
DOI: 10.1111/basr.12142
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Non‐Proxied Empirical Investigation of Cultures Effect on Corruption

Abstract: We empirically examine the effect of two measures of culture, the World Values Survey and Hofstede's six dimensions, on three measures of corruption, Transparency International's CPI, the International Country Risk Guide, and the World Bank's Corruption Index. By adopting three measures of corruption and using a large data set covering many countries over many years, we offer more robust results as to the effects of aspects of culture on corruption. Using the World Values Survey, we find that Trust in society,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A strong positive correlation was established between the CPI value and people's sharing values such as risk and uncertainty aversion, masculinity, and power distance (Husted, 1999). The opposite (corruption deterring) effect was revealed for such values as social trust and respect for others, while individualism and leniency turn out to be pro-cor-ruption factors (Mornah, Macdermott, 2018). Correlation between the level of corruption and cultural norms is manifested not only at the macro-level, but also for individuals and enterprises (Agyei-Mensah, Buertey, 2019; Barr, Serra, 2010).…”
Section: Finding Proxy Variables: An Overview Of Approachesmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…A strong positive correlation was established between the CPI value and people's sharing values such as risk and uncertainty aversion, masculinity, and power distance (Husted, 1999). The opposite (corruption deterring) effect was revealed for such values as social trust and respect for others, while individualism and leniency turn out to be pro-cor-ruption factors (Mornah, Macdermott, 2018). Correlation between the level of corruption and cultural norms is manifested not only at the macro-level, but also for individuals and enterprises (Agyei-Mensah, Buertey, 2019; Barr, Serra, 2010).…”
Section: Finding Proxy Variables: An Overview Of Approachesmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…First, other corruption measures can be applied, at least, as robustness tests. Recently, scholars have used Corruption Index published by World Governance (Ozili, 2019; Mornah and Macdermott, 2018; Jiménez et al , 2017) and by International Country Risk Guide (Mukherjee, 2018). Further, some researchers have applied cultural distance measures as additional control variables.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to seek opportunities outside their home environment, firms need knowledge about the business environment of the foreign country. However, the internationalization process involves uncertainties and risks related to the cultural and business environment of the foreign country (Mornah and Macdermott 2018). Therefore, lack of knowledge about the foreign country's cultural, political, social, and economic complexities can increase the risks and uncertainties for firms seeking to internationalize (Johanson and Vahlne 2017; Ghemawat 2003; Krishna Erramilli and Derrick 1995; Hernandez 2014; Johanson and Vahlne 2017; Ghemawat 2001; Porter 1985).…”
Section: Theoretical Framework and Hypothesis—a Knowledge‐based Viewmentioning
confidence: 99%