53rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control 2014
DOI: 10.1109/cdc.2014.7040226
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A non-myopic, receding horizon control strategy for an AUV to track an underwater target in a bistatic sonar scenario

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3) Prosecution: in the prosecution state, the selected confirmed track is prosecuted by using the non-myopic algorithm [3]. The AUV continues the prosecution until the track breaks becoming unobserved.…”
Section: E Mission Manager Layer: Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…3) Prosecution: in the prosecution state, the selected confirmed track is prosecuted by using the non-myopic algorithm [3]. The AUV continues the prosecution until the track breaks becoming unobserved.…”
Section: E Mission Manager Layer: Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2) Disambiguation: the AUV starts optimizing the highest score track by using the non-myopic optimization algorithm previously described [21]. At this point, the choice of the track to be prosecuted is arbitrary.…”
Section: E Mission Manager Layer: Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations