2017
DOI: 10.1080/19386362.2017.1410337
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A non-linear load transfer method for determining the settlement of piles under vertical loading

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 6 shows that the mobilized base resistance (i.e., Q b /(P/A)) increases when the distance L p decreases. In particularly this ratio rises swiftly from around 10% to more than 30% when L p becomes less than 10 m. This observation, in fact, corroborates well previous data for large diameter bored piles [1,10,17,38,44]. The longer the distance, the harder the base resistance can be mobilized.…”
Section: Model Inputs and Outputssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure 6 shows that the mobilized base resistance (i.e., Q b /(P/A)) increases when the distance L p decreases. In particularly this ratio rises swiftly from around 10% to more than 30% when L p becomes less than 10 m. This observation, in fact, corroborates well previous data for large diameter bored piles [1,10,17,38,44]. The longer the distance, the harder the base resistance can be mobilized.…”
Section: Model Inputs and Outputssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…While it is well understood that the axial bearing capacity of a pile is mainly contributed by its shaft friction and base (or toe) resistance, immense effort has gone to establishing different methods to estimate bearing capacity of piles over the past years. Many solutions are based on complex mathematical derivations and numerical analysis [14,27,38,41], while others employ empirical equations derived from field tests such as Standard Penetration Test (SPT value) [19,30,49], Cone Penetration Test (CPT) [22,36,67] and field static/dynamic load tests [10,20,30]. Despite these various solutions, a significant limitation that most conventional approaches commonly share is their limited consideration of past experience as well as data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering the similarity between the anchor-soil and pile-soil interfaces and mature research on the shear model of pile-soil interface [17,18], most previous studies on the shear model of anchor-soil interface utilized the relevant conclusions of the shear model of pile-soil interface. To investigate the shear characteristics of the anchor-soil interface, Chen et al [19] developed a tester that simulated the bonding characteristics of anchor-soil interface under various environmental conditions in batches and proposed a new shear model of anchor-soil interface.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past, the ζ factor was devised under elastic mediums in non-slip analytical models, as described in Lo et al [8]. Recently, the limitations of non-slip analytical models have been discussed in Wang et al [5], Lo et al [8], Sheil and McCabe [9], Boonyatee and Lai [10], and slipping analytical models were recommended. In this study, the ζ factor in slipping analytical models is reviewed using finite element (FE) analyses of homogeneous and vertically inhomogeneous (Gibson soil, linear increase in the soil shear modulus (G) with depth) soils under the linear elastic and Mohr-Coulomb (MC, linear-elastic-perfectly-plastic) models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%