2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2010.01.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A non-linear index to evaluate a journal’s scientific impact

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To stress the expansive development of aggregation theory and its applications in information sciences we recall some of recent publications in this area, namely [7,9,24,43,45,47,59,69,70].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To stress the expansive development of aggregation theory and its applications in information sciences we recall some of recent publications in this area, namely [7,9,24,43,45,47,59,69,70].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The idea from previous work [25] was selected as a benchmark for describing the ideal vector's high risk case. In this work, as a benchmark consideration, a set of a vector's values were used that has a null probability (high risk) of developing ET≥3 mm.…”
Section: Extraction Of the Cited Distancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Automated reference extraction systems will be relevant for these studies. For instance, Shi et al [26] worked on anchor text extraction; Papavlasopoulos [20] worked on evaluating the scientific impact of journal; and Kerne et al [13] developed applications that could be useful to represent the output of automated metadata extraction applied to specific context like in our research. Several researchers have applied the hidden Markov model for different information extraction tasks with good performance when applied to the tasks in both structured, semi structured and free text [17].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%